Loading...
Health and human rights in scientific literature
Chastonay, Philippe London, Leslie Verloo, Henk Kabengele Mpinga, Emmanuel
Chastonay, Philippe
London, Leslie
Verloo, Henk
Kabengele Mpinga, Emmanuel
Contributor(s)
Keywords
Collections
Files
Loading...
n431-1679-1-PB.pdf
Adobe PDF, 1.13 MB
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Online Access
Abstract
Background Over the past decades, the health and human rights movement has become a public health actor that cannot and should not be ignored when defining public health policies. Little has been published about the scientific contribution of the movement, be it in terms of volume, topics, content, diffusion channels, production, or target sites. Objective This article aims to characterize the scientific production of articles focusing on “health and human rights” and to describe its evolution over a decade. Methods A systematic review of the literature was done. The following databases were considered: Medline, Embase, BDSP, Wholis, Saphir, Rero and Web of Science. The analysis focused on English and French contributions published between January 1, 1999 and December 31, 2008. Results Nine hundred and twenty eight articles, which had been published in 377 different journals, were reviewed. Among these articles, 43.7% had been written by one author and 56.3% by two or more authors. Over the studied decade, the production volume increased threefold. Most frequent developed topics were related to health systems (18.3%), mental health (11.5%), HIV/AIDS (10.3%), and reproductive health (9.2%). Emerging topics included the rights of patients (2.7%), new technologies (2.5%), and handicap (2.5%). Studies were classified according to their design in: social analysis (42.7%), reviews of the literature (19.8%), qualitative studies (17.9%), editorials (12.5%), and epidemiological studies (6.8%). Most studies were published in public health (34.5%) and biomedical journals (29.0%), while some appeared in social science journals (4.7%). The studies were related to global issues/settings (43.9%), or more specifically to country settings, for example, the United States (9.3%), Great Britain (7.8%), South Africa (3.3%), Australia (3.0%), Canada (2.6%), France (2.3%), and India (1.9%). The authors were mainly from industrialized countries. Conclusion The publication of articles on health and human rights issues is increasing, and new topics are being addressed. Yet more evidence-based studies might be necessary to scientifically strengthen the domain.
Note(s)
Topic
Type
Article
Date
2011-12
Identifier
ISBN
DOI
Copyright/License
Creative Commons Copyright (CC 2.5)