LOVE AND THE INDIRECT ICON LOVE AND THE INDIRECT ICON: KIERKEGAARD, DOSTOEVSKY AND CHRISTIAN EROTICS BY
Contributor(s)
The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.841.1290https://macsphere.mcmaster.ca/bitstream/11375/9474/1/fulltext.pdf
Abstract
This thesis brings the work of Soren Kierkegaard into conversation with Orthodox theology in order to explore the question of love as an iconic bond between eternity and the temporal. Though Kierkegaard's account of human love stands in stark contrast to certain Orthodox readings on exactly the matter of iconic possibility, I tum to the Russian novelist Fyodor Dostoevsky in order to argue for a conception of the icon as indirect in ways that complicate easy distinctions between eastern and western traditions of Christianity. I suggest that Dostoevsky's iconologic sensibilities are predicated on a conception of faith characteristic of Kierkegaard, wherein God's self-communication in Christ passes through offense at the paradoxical lowliness by which the divine is revealed. An image does not draw its beholder into the divine life directly, by virtue of some immediate capacity to attract or compel, but indirectly through a relation in faith to the fullness of the hidden source that the image makes so partially visible. I argue that Kierkegaard's Works of Love can be read in terms ofthis iconic movement, and that the iconology of Dostoevsky's The Brothers Karamazov can be read in terms of thisDate
2016-09-04Type
textIdentifier
oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.841.1290http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.841.1290