'Do not attempt resuscitation' and 'cardiopulmonary resuscitation' in an inpatient setting: factors influencing physicians' decisions in Switzerland.
Keywords
Adult; Aged; Attitude to Death; Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/ethics; Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/psychology; Critical Illness/psychology; Decision Making/ethics; Ethics Committees, Clinical/statistics&
numerical data; Female; Hospitals, Teaching; Humans; Inpatients/psychology; Male; Medical Futility/ethics; Medical Futility/legislation
&
jurisprudence; Middle Aged; Physicians/psychology; Prognosis; Quality of Life/psychology; Resuscitation Orders/ethics; Resuscitation Orders/legislation
&
jurisprudence; hic" UI="D013557"
>
Switzerland
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://serval.unil.ch/?id=serval:BIB_D17851C15FD9Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and do-not-attempt-resuscitation (DNAR) orders, to define factors associated with CPR/DNAR orders and to explore how physicians make and document these decisions. METHODS: We prospectively reviewed CPR/DNAR forms of 1,446 patients admitted to the General Internal Medicine Department of the Geneva University Hospitals, a tertiary-care teaching hospital in Switzerland. We additionally administered a face-to-face survey to residents in charge of 206 patients including DNAR and CPR orders, with or without patient inclusion. RESULTS: 21.2% of the patients had a DNAR order, 61.7% a CPR order and 17.1% had neither. The two main factors associated with DNAR orders were a worse prognosis and/or a worse quality of life. Others factors were an older age, cancer and psychiatric diagnoses, and the absence of decision-making capacity. Residents gave four major justifications for DNAR orders: important comorbid conditions (34%), the patients' or their family's resuscitation preferences (18%), the patients' age (14.2%), and the absence of decision-making capacity (8%). Residents who wrote DNAR orders were more experienced. In many of the DNAR or CPR forms (19.8 and 16%, respectively), the order was written using a variety of formulations. For 24% of the residents, the distinction between the resuscitation order and the care objective was not clear. 38% of the residents found the resuscitation form useful. CONCLUSION: Patients' prognosis and quality of life were the two main independent factors associated with CPR/DNAR orders. However, in the majority of cases, residents evaluated prognosis only intuitively, and quality of life without involving the patients. The distinction between CPR/DNAR orders and the care objectives was not always clear. Specific training regarding CPR/DNAR orders is necessary to improve the CPR/DNAR decision process used by physicians.Date
2011Type
info:eu-repo/semantics/articleIdentifier
oai:serval.unil.ch:BIB_D17851C15FD9http://serval.unil.ch/?id=serval:BIB_D17851C15FD9
isbn:1423-0003 (Electronic)
pmid:21099190
doi:10.1159/000319422
DOI
10.1159/000319422ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1159/000319422
Scopus Count
Collections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
'Do not attempt resuscitation' and 'cardiopulmonary resuscitation' in an inpatient setting: factors influencing physicians' decisions in SwitzerlandBecerra, Maria-Elisa; Hurst, Samia; Junod Perron, Noëlle Astrid; Cochet, Stéphane; Elger, Bernice Simone (2011)To determine the prevalence of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and do-not-attempt-resuscitation (DNAR) orders, to define factors associated with CPR/DNAR orders and to explore how physicians make and document these decisions.
-
Moral, Ethical, and Legal Dilemmas in the Intensive Care UnitShragg, Thomas A.; Albertson, Timothy E. (2015-05-05)
-
Delivery Room Resuscitation of the High-Risk Infant: A Conflict of RightsCooper, Rebecca (2015-05-05)