Keywords
AlternativesAutonomy
Case Studies
Clergy
Clinical Ethics
Competence
Constitutional Law
Consent
Consultation
Decision Making
Diagnosis
Ethics
Evaluation
Family Members
Hospitals
Informed Consent
Law
Legal Aspects
Legal Rights
Patients
Physician Patient Relationship
Physicians
Privacy
Psychiatric Diagnosis
Psychiatry
Referral and Consultation
Religion
Rights
State Interest
Treatment Refusal
Values
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=Religious+Issues+in+the+Capacity+Evaluation&title=General+Hospital+Psychiatry.++&volume=18&issue=3&pages=173-182&date=1996&au=Waldfogel,+Shimonhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0163-8343(96)00003-5
http://hdl.handle.net/10822/754654
Abstract
The authors explore the difficulties present in the capacity evaluation of patients with strong religious beliefs. The article reviews the legal protection for treatment refusal on religious grounds as well as psychiatry's approach to religion. Clinical cases encountered in an urban hospital are presented to highlight how the conflicts among psychiatric, religious, and legal issues can be resolved. Suggestions are made for incorporating an exploration of religious values into the capacity assessment.Date
2015-05-05Identifier
oai:repository.library.georgetown.edu:10822/75465410.1016/0163-8343(96)00003-5
General Hospital Psychiatry. 1996 May; 18(3): 173-182.
0163-8343
http://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=Religious+Issues+in+the+Capacity+Evaluation&title=General+Hospital+Psychiatry.++&volume=18&issue=3&pages=173-182&date=1996&au=Waldfogel,+Shimon
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0163-8343(96)00003-5
http://hdl.handle.net/10822/754654