Author(s)
McGough, M.D., Peter M.Keywords
physician-assisted suicideeuthanasia
ethical concerns
professional ethics
right to refuse treatment
safeguards
right-to-die
death with dignity
Constitutional Law
Other Law
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/sulr/vol18/iss3/6http://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1456&context=sulr
Abstract
The November 8, 1994 passage of Oregon's Measure 16, which permits physicians to comply with the request of a competent adult patient with less than six months to live for a prescription for lethal drugs, has intensified the debate over the legalization of physician-assisted suicide following the defeats of similar initiatives in Washington and California. Subsequent legal challenge to Measure 16 and the present preliminary injunction3 has shown that passage and popularity of a public initiative does not ensure its legality. The issue of physician-assisted suicide is most likely headed for the United States Supreme Court. This Article is intended, however, to review the medical concerns of the legalization of physician-assisted suicide and its potential impact on physicians and patients. The issue merits careful study not simply because of the unique concerns of legalized euthanasia, but also because of its critical relationship to physicians and their care of dying patients.Date
1995-01-01Type
textIdentifier
oai:digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu:sulr-1456http://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/sulr/vol18/iss3/6
http://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1456&context=sulr