Constitutional Law -- Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments -- a State Cannot Forcibly Medicate a Criminal Defendant During Trial Without Evidence of a Compelling State Interest. Riggins v. Nevada, 112 S. Ct. 1810 (1992)
Author(s)
Stirling, Ann M.Keywords
Constitutional LawLaw
State Interest
Psychopharmacology
Government Ethics
Right to Refuse Treatment
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=Constitutional+Law+Sixth+and+Fourteenth+Amendments+A+State+Cannot+Forcibly+Medicate+a+Criminal+Defendant+During+Trial+Without+Evidence+of+a+Compelling+State+Interest.++Riggins+v.+Nevada,+112+S.+Ct.++1810&title=UNIVERSITY+OF+DETROIT+MERCY+LAW+REVIEW+&volume=70&issue=4&spage=973-987&date=1993-06&au=Stirling,+Ann+M.http://hdl.handle.net/10822/865520
Date
2016-01-08Identifier
oai:repository.library.georgetown.edu:10822/865520UNIVERSITY OF DETROIT MERCY LAW REVIEW 1993 Summer; 70(4): 973-987
http://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=Constitutional+Law+Sixth+and+Fourteenth+Amendments+A+State+Cannot+Forcibly+Medicate+a+Criminal+Defendant+During+Trial+Without+Evidence+of+a+Compelling+State+Interest.++Riggins+v.+Nevada,+112+S.+Ct.++1810&title=UNIVERSITY+OF+DETROIT+MERCY+LAW+REVIEW+&volume=70&issue=4&spage=973-987&date=1993-06&au=Stirling,+Ann+M.
http://hdl.handle.net/10822/865520