Police-induced confessions, risk factors, and recommendations: looking ahead
Author(s)
Kassin, Saul M.Drizin, Steven A.
Grisso, Thomas
Gudjonsson, Gisli H.
Leo, Richard A.
Redlich, Allison D.
Keywords
*CoercionInterviews as Topic
Judgment
*Jurisprudence
*Police
Review Literature as Topic
Risk Factors
*Truth Disclosure
Criminal Procedure
Law and Psychology
Law Enforcement and Corrections
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility
Psychiatry
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/faculty_pubs/276http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10979-010-9217-5
Abstract
Reviewing the literature on police-induced confessions, we identified suspect characteristics and interrogation tactics that influence confessions and their effects on juries. We concluded with a call for the mandatory electronic recording of interrogations and a consideration of other possible reforms. The preceding commentaries make important substantive points that can lead us forward-on the effects of videotaping of interrogations on case dispositions; on the study of non-custodial methods, such as the controversial Mr. Big technique; and on an analysis of why confessions, once withdrawn, elicit such intractable responses compared to statements given by child and adult victims. Toward these ends, we hope that this issue provides a platform for future research aimed at improving the diagnostic value of confession evidence.Date
2010-02-01Type
textIdentifier
oai:escholarship.umassmed.edu:faculty_pubs-1275http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/faculty_pubs/276
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10979-010-9217-5