Incentives to Settle Under Joint and Several Liability: An Empirical Analysis of Superfund Litigation
Keywords
LitigationPractice and Procedure
Environmental Law
Government Regulation
Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics
Civil Procedure
Dispute Resolution and Arbitration
Environmental Law
Environmental Policy
Law
Law and Economics
Law and Society
Mathematics
Science and Technology Law
Statistical Theory
Work, Economy and Organizations
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship/898http://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1894&context=faculty_scholarship
Abstract
Congress may soon restrict joint and several liability for cleanup of contaminated sites under Superfund. We explore whether this change would discourage settlements and is therefore likely to increase the program 's already high litigation costs per site. Recent theoretical research by Kornhauser and Revesz finds that joint and several liability may either encourage or discourage settlement, depending on the correlation of outcomes at trial across defendants. We extend their two-defendant model to a richer framework with N defendants. This extension allows us to test the theoretical model empirically using data on Superfund litigation. We find that joint and several liability does not discourage settlements and may even encourage them . Our results support the model's predictions about the effects of several variables, such as the degree of correlation in trial outcomes.Date
2000-01-01Type
textIdentifier
oai:scholarship.law.upenn.edu:faculty_scholarship-1894http://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship/898
http://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1894&context=faculty_scholarship