KeywordsPR English literature
Full recordShow full item record
AbstractThe article explores the relationship of Chaucer's 'Lollius' to a broader medieval tradition of fictitious authors, arguing that Chaucer's self-presentation as a 'compilator' cannot be fully accounted for by the 'medieval theory of authorship'. It is likely that 'he was also influenced by a tradition of secular entertainment, outside the range of scholastic commentary and incorporating rather different assumptions about the use of literature . . . the historical authenticity of the [scholastic] viewpoint needs to be carefully weighed against the narrowness of the view.'
Millett, Bella (1985) Chaucer, Lollius, and the medieval theory of authorship. In, Strohm, Paul and Heffernan, Thomas J. (eds.) Studies in the Age of Chaucer, Proceedings, No. 1, 1984: Reconstructing Chaucer. Congress of the New Chaucer Society Knoxville, USA, New Chaucer Society, 93-103. (Studies in the Age of Chaucer, Proceedings 1).