Strategy-proof package assignment
dc.contributor.author | Erlanson, Albin | |
dc.contributor.author | Szwagrzak, Karol | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-10-24T22:44:54Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-10-24T22:44:54Z | |
dc.date.created | 2017-02-28 02:03 | |
dc.identifier | oai:RePEc:hhs:sdueko:2014_005 | |
dc.identifier | RePEc:hhs:sdueko:2014_005 | |
dc.identifier | http://static.sdu.dk/mediafiles//D/E/A/%7BDEA6DF8B-9FF5-4EDE-B551-B94E60DEDFEF%7Ddpbe5_2014.pdf | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/1133775 | |
dc.description.abstract | We examine the strategy-proof allocation of multiple divisible and indivisible resources; an application is the assignment of packages of tasks, workloads, and compensations among the members of an organization. We find that any allocation mechanism obtained by maximizing a separably concave function over a polyhedral extension of the set of Pareto-efficient allocations is strategy-proof. Moreover, these are the only strategy-proof and unanimous mechanisms satisfying a coherence property and responding well to changes in the availability of resources. These mechanisms generalize the parametric rationing mechanisms (Young, 1987), some of which date back to the Babylonian Talmud. | |
dc.description.abstract | Package assignment; Indivisible objects; Strategy-proofness | |
dc.title | Strategy-proof package assignment | |
dc.type | preprint | |
ge.collectioncode | OAIDATA | |
ge.dataimportlabel | OAI metadata object | |
ge.identifier.legacy | globethics:10795244 | |
ge.identifier.permalink | https://www.globethics.net/gtl/10795244 | |
ge.lastmodificationdate | 2017-02-28 02:03 | |
ge.lastmodificationuser | admin@pointsoftware.ch (import) | |
ge.submissions | 0 | |
ge.oai.exportid | 149001 | |
ge.oai.repositoryid | 1228 | |
ge.oai.setname | RePEc | |
ge.oai.setspec | RePEc | |
ge.oai.streamid | 5 | |
ge.setname | GlobeTheoLib | |
ge.setspec | globetheolib | |
ge.link | http://static.sdu.dk/mediafiles//D/E/A/%7BDEA6DF8B-9FF5-4EDE-B551-B94E60DEDFEF%7Ddpbe5_2014.pdf |