Islamic Political Ethics : Civil Society, Pluralism, and Conflict /
Author(s)
Hashmi, Sohail H., editor.Keywords
Civil society.Guerre
Islam and state.
Islamic ethics.
Political ethics.
POLITICAL SCIENCE
RELIGION
War
Civil society.
Cultural pluralism.
Islam and state.
Islam et État.
Islam.
Islamic ethics.
Islamitische filosofie.
Morale islamique.
Morale politique.
Philosophie.
Pluralisme.
Political ethics.
Politieke filosofie.
Religion, Jewish Studies, Theology.
Religion.
Société civile.
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400825370https://www.degruyter.com/doc/cover/9781400825370.jpg
Abstract
One of the most dynamic aspects of the Islamic revival during the past two centuries has been the rethinking of Islamic political thought. A broad range of actors, ideas, and ideologies characterize the debate on how Islamic ethics and law should be manifested in modern institutions. Yet this aspect of the "return to Islam" has been neglected by policymakers, the media, and even many scholars, who equate "political Islam" with merely one strand, labeled "Islamic fundamentalism." Bringing together ten essays from six volumes of the Ethikon Series in Comparative Ethics, this book gives a rounded treatment to the subject of Islamic political ethics. The authors explore the Islamic ethics of civil society, boundaries, pluralism, and war and peace. They consider questions of diversity, discussing, among other subjects, Islamic regimes' policies regarding women and religious minorities. The chapters on war and peace take up such crucial and timely issues as the Islamic ethics of jihad, examining both the legitimate conditions for the declaration of war and the proper conduct of war. In their discussions, the contributors analyze the works of classical writers as well as the full range of modern reinterpretations. But beyond these analyses of previous and contemporary thinkers, the essays also reach back to the two fundamental sources of Islamic ethics--the Qur'an and traditions of the Prophet--to develop fresh insights into how Islam and Muslims can contribute to human society in the twenty-first century. The authors are Dale F. Eickelman, Hasan Hanafi, Sohail H. Hashmi, Farhad Kazemi, John Kelsay, Muhammad Khalid Masud, Sulayman Nyang, Bassam Tibi, and M. Raquibuz Zaman. From the foreword by Jack Miles: "Western foreign ministers and secretaries of state may have to learn a little theology if the looming clash between embattled elements both in the West and in the Muslim umma is to yield to disengagement and peaceful coexistence, to say nothing of fruitful collaboration.... It is, then, no idle academic exercise that the thinkers whose work is collected here have in hand. The long-term practical importance of their work can scarcely be overstated.".One of the most dynamic aspects of the Islamic revival during the past two centuries has been the rethinking of Islamic political thought. A broad range of actors, ideas, and ideologies characterize the debate on how Islamic ethics and law should be manifested in modern institutions. Yet this aspect of the "return to Islam" has been neglected by policymakers, the media, and even many scholars, who equate "political Islam" with merely one strand, labeled "Islamic fundamentalism." Bringing together ten essays from six volumes of the Ethikon Series in Comparative Ethics, this book gives a rounded treatment to the subject of Islamic political ethics. The authors explore the Islamic ethics of civil society, boundaries, pluralism, and war and peace. They consider questions of diversity, discussing, among other subjects, Islamic regimes' policies regarding women and religious minorities. The chapters on war and peace take up such crucial and timely issues as the Islamic ethics of jihad, examining both the legitimate conditions for the declaration of war and the proper conduct of war. In their discussions, the contributors analyze the works of classical writers as well as the full range of modern reinterpretations. But beyond these analyses of previous and contemporary thinkers, the essays also reach back to the two fundamental sources of Islamic ethics--the Qur'an and traditions of the Prophet--to develop fresh insights into how Islam and Muslims can contribute to human society in the twenty-first century. The authors are Dale F. Eickelman, Hasan Hanafi, Sohail H. Hashmi, Farhad Kazemi, John Kelsay, Muhammad Khalid Masud, Sulayman Nyang, Bassam Tibi, and M. Raquibuz Zaman. From the foreword by Jack Miles: "Western foreign ministers and secretaries of state may have to learn a little theology if the looming clash between embattled elements both in the West and in the Muslim umma is to yield to disengagement and peaceful coexistence, to say nothing of fruitful collaboration.... It is, then, no idle academic exercise that the thinkers whose work is collected here have in hand. The long-term practical importance of their work can scarcely be overstated.".
Electronic reproduction.
Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher’s Web site, viewed October 27 2015)
Type
textIdentifier
oai:search.ugent.be:ebk01:1000000000788383https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400825370
https://www.degruyter.com/doc/cover/9781400825370.jpg
URN:ISBN:9781400825370
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
İslamiyet üzerindeki büyük mutabakatın adı: Ehl-i Sünnet ve'l-Cemaat6261; Büyükkara, M.A. (TDV İstanbul Müftülüğü, 2019-07-30)
-
Islam : Einheit und Vielfalt einer WeltreligionBrunner, Rainer (1964-)
-
A FRAMEWORK FOR CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY IN ISLAMIC FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS: THEORY AND EVIDENCE FROM GCC REGION ALQARAN-ALZIYADAT, NASER,SALIH (2016)The present research addresses the need for the development of a framework for implementing the Islamic CSR of IFIs that exist in conventional economies (i.e. mainly capitalism). The literature review reveals that CSR has never existed in any economic system other than capitalism, and that in spite of the fact that CSR has been based on various theoretical groundings, the ontological worldview of capitalism (mainly economic selfish man) and the epistemological considerations (mainly value-free scientific economic laws used in the production of knowledge) have influenced the understanding of CSR. Thus, the CSR literature fails to address mismatches between the micro objectives of businesses and the macro objectives of society. Such mismatches are, however, taken into account in the Islamic theory of maqasid al-Sharia (Sharia objectives) and the Sharia jurisprudence method which facilitate the production of Sharia rulings through which a balance between micro and macro objectives is achieved. Thus, the present research aims to develop a framework for implementing Islamic CSR (ICSR) for IFIs, based on a built-in compliance with Sharia objectives and where Sharia objectives are achieved through the managerial implementation of Sharia jurisprudence. Four theoretical gaps in the literature on ICSR have been identified: (1) justification of the usage of the frameworks and models of conventional CSR on the basis of the Islamic worldview and epistemology, which are fundamentally different from those of capitalism; (2) the specification of methodologies appropriate to the Islamic worldview and epistemology; (3) the design of a framework for implementing Islamic CSR; and, (4) the design of a framework for measuring Islamic CSR. It is found that creating an innate ICSR framework is not an end in itself, but instead aims to achieve Sharia objectives that represent the socio-political economic objectives of society and businesses, and thus international CSR frameworks are used after adjusting them to the Islamic worldview and epistemology. Furthermore, the PDCA (plan, do, check act) cycle is deployed to implement the Sharia jurisprudence method underlying a managerial framework of implementing and measuring ICSR. The ability of the developed ICSR framework to describe reality has been empirically proven by testing nine null hypotheses against data collected from Sharia employees in IFIs in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) region. Moreover, several statistical patterns are identified regarding the survey respondents’ levels of knowledge of maqasid al-Sharia and conventional CSR, and the influence of organisational and individual differences on both levels of knowledge and the implementation of ICSR.