Author(s)
Baysinger, Timothy G.Keywords
Sociology and LawPsychology
Unconventional Warfare
*ORGANIZATIONS
*ATTITUDES(PSYCHOLOGY)
*UNITED STATES
*DOMESTIC
*TERRORISTS
*LEADERSHIP
DISCRIMINATION
RELIGION
DOCTRINE
ETHNIC GROUPS
RACE(ANTHROPOLOGY)
HISTORY
THREATS
GROUP DYNAMICS
CRIMES
REPRINTS
*RIGHT-WING EXTREMISTS
*IDEOLOGY
RIGHT-WING EXTREMISM
CHRISTIAN IDENTITY MOVEMENT
SEED-LINE THEOLOGY
NONWHITES
BRITISH-ISRAEL MOVEMENT
ARYANS
ANTISEMITISM
PREJUDICE
KKK(KU KLUX KLAN)
POSSE COMITATUS
ARYAN NATIONS
NEO-NAZIS
WHITE SUPREMACISTS
AL QAEDA
PHINEAS PRIESTS
MILITIA GROUPS
MILITIA MOVEMENT
CONSPIRACY THEORISTS
ANTIGOVERNMENT GROUPS
SOVEREIGN CITIZENS
FREEMEN
COMMON LAW COURTS
OKLAHOMA CITY BOMBING
TIMOTHY MCVEIGH
SEPARATIST GROUPS
NEHEMIAH TOWNSHIP CHARTER
SKINHEADS
HATE CRIMES
FUTURE TRENDS
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?&verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADA484154Abstract
Following the September 11, 2001, World Trade Center attack, our national attention was focused on Osama bin Laden, al Qaeda, and other radical Islamic extremists. On April 19, 1995, the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building was bombed by a native-born white male United States citizen who harbored right-wing extremist beliefs. While our collective consciousness prioritizes radical Islamists as the preeminent threat, should individuals and groups that encompass the radical right be viewed as having a reduced capacity to perform acts of terrorism? What future trends will be adopted by the radical right? How could these trends lead to an escalation of the threat posed by right-wing extremists? What can be done to reduce the threat of terrorism perpetrated by right-wing adherents? Before offering an answer to these questions, we should establish a knowledge baseline to understand the history, key figures, and beliefs of right-wing extremist groups in the United States. The specific ideology of right-wing extremism is frequently difficult to define because adherents have multiple and frequently simultaneous memberships in the array of right-wing groups. Many people involved in right-wing groups have come from other right-wing organizations and will likely move on to other groups as their beliefs change.Published in Homeland Security Affairs, v2 n2, p1-19, Jul 2006.
Date
2006-07Type
TextIdentifier
oai:ADA484154http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?&verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADA484154
Copyright/License
Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.Collections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Contemporary musicians. [electronic resource] : profiles of the people in musicInternet Archive; Rubiner, Julia M (Detroit, Mich. : Gale Research, 1994-01-01)"ISSN 1044-2197."
-
Student Leadership Conference Report 2010Santiago, Joseph A; Edmonds, Maxwell; Knoll, Christina (DigitalCommons@URI, 2010-02-17)This is the Student Leadership Conference Attendees Report from the retreat. This is the start of the I AM U-URI Unity in Difference group on campus.
-
"They Are Not Like Us" : Understanding Social ExclusionSacks, Audrey; Lakhani, Sadaf; Heltberg, Rasmus (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2014-03-18)Negative attitudes toward groups in society are widespread and underpin systematic processes of social exclusion that marginalize people and deny them opportunities and dignity. This paper looks at the processes underlying social exclusion. It uses data covering Eastern Europe and Central Asia to study the responses to a simple hypothetical survey question about which specific groups respondents would not like to have as neighbors. Unwelcoming attitudes toward groups such as immigrants, ethnic minorities, the poor, HIV+ individuals, and others are surprisingly common. These attitudes fall into three distinct clusters: intolerance for the poor and for different lifecycle stages; intolerance toward stigmatized attributes and behaviors; and intolerance toward specific identity groups. An empirical analysis of the determinants of attitudes shows that country-specific factors are far more important than socio-economic characteristics. These findings could have important implications for theories about exclusion and for the design of appropriate social inclusion policies. The authors argue that strategies to address social exclusion need to consider ways to change social norms, attitudes, and behaviors toward disadvantaged groups. The paper explores potential entry points for change within formal and informal institutions.