Vulnerable live patients, powerful dead patients: A textual analysis of doctor-patient relationships in popular Chinese medical dramas
Author(s)
Li ChenKeywords
doctor-patient communicationpopular medical drama(s)
Confucian ethics
framing theory
extended definition of patients
Fine Arts
N
Arts in general
NX1-820
General Works
A
History of scholarship and learning. The humanities
AZ20-999
Full record
Show full item recordAbstract
Using Framing Theory as a theoretical framework, this study examined depictions of patients and doctor-patient communication in Chinese medical dramas. The textual analysis had two major findings. First, Chinese medical dramas extended the definition of “patient” to include family members, an outcome of the impact of Confucian ethics. Second, doctor-patient communication was found to be two-fold: conversations during interventions were typically paternalistic, while conversations about non-medical issues exhibited consumeristic features. Doctors’ unshakable dominance during interventions resulted from patients’ lack of awareness of their rights as independent individuals, while doctors’ vulnerable position in medical disputes resulted from systemic deficits in the current legal system. Both trends challenged the typical doctor-patient relationships described by previous literature. Instead of introducing ordinary people’s reactions to rare or extreme situations, these shows were found to emphasize people’s unusual reactions to ordinary situations. Overall, Chinese media dramas defined and presented inherent problems in doctor-patient communication, elaborated the causes of most of these problems, and made moral judgments about these issues using vivid individual stories, but they did not attempt to offer solutions to these problems.Date
2019-01-01Type
ArticleIdentifier
oai:doaj.org/article:ffc7db3f518242d8bac3e562308d5be42331-1983
10.1080/23311983.2019.1622626
https://doaj.org/article/ffc7db3f518242d8bac3e562308d5be4
Collections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
“What Is PER?” Patient Engagement in Research as a HitBélisle-Pipon, Jean-Christophe; Del Grande, Claudio; Rouleau, Geneviève (Programmes de bioéthique, École de santé publique de l'Université de MontréalÉrudit, 2018)Engaging patients in research conduct and agenda setting is increasingly considered as an ethical imperative, and a way to transcend views of patients as passive subjects by fostering their empowerment. However, patient engagement in research (PER) is still an emerging approach with debated definitional and operational frameworks. This song addresses the sometimes difficult encounter and elusive mutual understanding between researchers and patients. “What is PER?” is an impressionistic illustration of the challenges and issues that can be found in the universe of patient engagement in research.
-
Do Patients Know How to Use Sublingual Glyceryl Trinitrate?HENMAN, MARTIN; Deasy, Evelyn; Kirke, Ciara; Naddy, Helen (2018-07-06)PUBLISHED
-
[Autonomy and practical identity. Cornerstones to ethical physician behavior].Colt, Henri (eScholarship, University of California, 2006-01-01)Three frequent problems of daily medical practice are analyzed: (1) a physician's perceived obligation to provide medical services regardless of whether one's health care institution provides monetary compensation for the medical act, (2) increasing pressures to obtain informed consent in a national context where paternalistic physician-patient interactions have been customary, and (3) a physician's professional responsibility to offer internationally recognized standard of care even if this means allocating expensive tertiary healthcare resources to a small number of patients in spite of one's knowledge that national governments are unable to provide primary care to millions of their citizens. These problems are discussed from the point of view of the ethical principle of respect for patient autonomy. Potential limiting factors (cultural, financial, religious or disease-related influences) on autonomy of patients and doctors are identified. The functions of patient autonomy in the framework of four different patient-doctor interaction models (paternalist, informative, interpretative and deliberatibe) are described. Physician leaders, health care institutions, and professional organizations are responsible for creating an environment in which doctors can discuss ethical issues as comfortably and as frequently as they discuss biological matters. Health care providers should do their best to recover the human side of medical practice which, undoubtedly, would create a greater likelihood that appropriate decisions will be made when facing complex ethical dilemmas.