Author(s)
Turnquist, BeritContributor(s)
Reasoner, PaulKeywords
Department of PhilosophyConfucian ethics; Philosophy, Confucian; Women philosphers; Im, Yunjidang, 1721-1793;
Sagehood; gender in philosophy; Analects of Confucius; women's roles in 5th Century BC; Im Yunjidang
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://content.clic.edu/u?/p16120coll7,116Abstract
In the context of Confucian ethics, there are few concepts as indefinable yet centrally important to the system of thought as a whole as the ideal of the sage. The sage is a key topic of discussion in The Analects of Confucius, and has been the subject of much reflection, revision, and discussion by neo-Confucian scholars throughout history. For centuries, however, one segment of the population was largely absent from the annals of Confucian scholarship, namely, women. The goal of this essay is to argue that, although women are rarely addressed in the canon of Confucian writings, women are not in essence excluded from pursuing Confucian sagehood, or the moral designation of Junzi. To support my argument, I will first define the Confucian sage (and differences, if any, between the sage and the Junzi), then examine the actions and traits required for becoming a sage in contrast and comparison with women’s roles in the 5th century BCE, and finally, end with a brief acknowledgement of Im Yunjidang, a female scholar in the 18th century who exemplified and deliberately aligned herself with the picture of the Confucian sage.Date
2018-04Type
textIdentifier
oai:content.clic.edu:p16120coll7/116BeritTurnquist_ResearchPaper.pdf
http://content.clic.edu/u?/p16120coll7,116