• English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • English 
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Religious ethics collections
  • Confucian Ethics / 儒家伦理
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Religious ethics collections
  • Confucian Ethics / 儒家伦理
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All of the LibraryCommunitiesPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsThis CollectionPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsProfilesView

My Account

Login

The Library

AboutNew SubmissionSubmission GuideSearch GuideRepository PolicyContact

Statistics

Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

In the Shadow of the Decay. The Philosophy of History of Mencius and Xunzi

  • CSV
  • RefMan
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • RefWorks
Author(s)
Rogacz, Dawid
Keywords
Confucianism
Mencius
Xunzi
philosophy of history
Mandate of Heaven
idealization

Full record
Show full item record
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/118532
Online Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10593/17373
Abstract
The aim of my paper is to analyze the debate between Mencius and Xunzi from the
 perspective of their views on the nature of the historical process. The Mencian approach
 embraces not only elaboration on the doctrine of the Mandate of Heaven, resulting in
 a cyclical vision of history, but also strong idealization of the past. I will show that ren
 (benevolence), treated as a historical principle, could link two dimensions of his historical
 thinking: the moral and ontological. Xunzi rejected the possibility of the intervention of
 Heaven in history, however, his theory of rituals and belief in moral use of history made
 his philosophy of history much more conservative, embalming the idealization of the past.
 In short, I will look for the main common points and differences between these two major
 figures of Confucianism regarding their views on history, attempting to answer which
 beliefs could constitute a unique Confucian philosophy of history.
Date
2017-01-17
Type
Artykuł
Identifier
oai:repozytorium.amu.edu.pl:10593/17373
Asian Studies V (XXI), 1 (2017), pp. 147–171
2350-4226
http://hdl.handle.net/10593/17373
Copyright/License
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Collections
Confucian Ethics / 儒家伦理
Philosophical Ethics

entitlement

 
DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
Quick Guide | Contact Us
Open Repository is a service operated by 
Atmire NV
 

Export search results

The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.