• English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • English 
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • OAI Data Pool
  • OAI Harvested Content
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • OAI Data Pool
  • OAI Harvested Content
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All of the LibraryCommunitiesPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsThis CollectionPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsProfilesView

My Account

Login

The Library

AboutNew SubmissionSubmission GuideSearch GuideRepository PolicyContact

Statistics

Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

A phenomenological study on the perceptions of university professors regarding the philosophical orientations underlying the assessment-driven model of education

  • CSV
  • RefMan
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • RefWorks
Author(s)
Pietrolungo, Stephen
Contributor(s)
Mirci, Philip
Keywords
Dissertations (EdD) -- Organizational leadership; Educational evaluation; Educational change;
No Child Left Behind; Education policy assessments

Full record
Show full item record
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/1227419
Online Access
http://cdm15093.contentdm.oclc.org/u?/p15093coll2,151
Abstract
This phenomenological study of the current education reform model concerns this central research question: What are the perceptions of five California university professors working within a school of education in terms of learning theory, curriculum perspectives, and philosophical orientations? Throughout the history and development of American education, concurrent political ideologies influenced reform. Interviewees were university professors preparing students to serve as teachers and administrators within the public school system. Findings revealed that the current reforms are at odds with the development skills like problem solving, global awareness, critical and creative thinking, independent learning, collaborative learning, communication, and reflection. Schools need to integrate core curriculum, interdisciplinary themes and skills, along with modern technologies and pedagogies that enable the student to prepare for modern living. Today's students need hands-on, inquiry-based instruction and a lab-based experiment approach with computer-based lessons and performance-based assessments take a back seat in the current reform model. Findings supported these conclusions: 1. Transform the education system whereby the curriculum is process-oriented, using a constructivist approach to teaching, consistent with neuroscience research. 2. Assessments must become authentic. Students must demonstrate their development of inquiry and use critical thinking in problem-posing and problem-solving. 3. The transformation of the current standards-based and assessment-driven model of the education system should be based on a curriculum that reflects current demographic realities. This necessitates a paradigm shift from the monoculturalism that has continued to dominate education to an inclusive system that reflects multiculturalism. 4. Schools must promote academic excellence with meaningful learning goals that include the content, technology, and skills needed for the 21st century, with the primary emphasis placed on the development of critical thinking skills and systemic thinking. 5. Schools need to be organized for teacher learning with support for collaboration time for teachers to learn and plan together. 6. Schools must immerse students in the development of technological literacy and the use of technology in developing information literacy. School districts must begin enacting policies and programs to close the digital divide. 7. Fiscal resources for schools must become a priority. The fiscal equity gap must be closed.
242
Pepperdine University
Graduate School of Education and Psychology
Education;
Doctorate
Date
2011
Type
Text
Identifier
oai:cdm15093.contentdm.oclc.org:p15093coll2/151
http://cdm15093.contentdm.oclc.org/u?/p15093coll2,151
Copyright/License
Copyright is retained by the author. Permission is granted to quote from this thesis or dissertation with appropriate attribution. Reproduction in any form requires permission from the author. Pepperdine University has non-exclusive publication rights.
Collections
OAI Harvested Content

entitlement

 
DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2022)  DuraSpace
Quick Guide | Contact Us
Open Repository is a service operated by 
Atmire NV
 

Export search results

The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.