Theology disrupted : doing theology with children in African contexts
Author(s)
Mahlangu, ElijahContributor(s)
stephan.debeer@up.ac.zaKeywords
Child theologyChildren in Africa
African bible critic and exegete
Family symbolism
African context
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/2263/60565Abstract
The thrust of this article is an attempt to respond to the question whether we can read and
 interpret the bible in Africa from the child theology vantage point. The author’s answer is in
 the affirmative in two ways: Firstly, it is that the majority of children in Africa are facing abuses
 of unprecedented proportions. Historically and traditionally, African scholars always read and
 interpreted the bible with African lenses. The African bible critic and exegete should be part of
 the church, the body of Christ which ought to be a lotus of healing. Theologising in the context
 of the crisis of the ‘child’ in Africa is fairly a new development and needs to be aggressively
 pursued. The second aspect of this author’s response is that when Christianity entered the
 Graeco-Roman as well the Jewish milieu, it used the family symbolism such as father, brothers,
 love, house of God, children of God, and so on. The New Testament authors therefore used
 family as reality and metaphor to proclaim the gospel. The African theologian, critic and
 exegete, is therefore in this article challenged to make a significant contribution using the
 African context in that, ‘… the African concept of child, family and community appears to be
 closer to ecclesiology than the Western concepts’.This article emanates from a consultation on ‘Child Theology’ in August 2015, co-hosted by the Centre of Contextual Ministry,
 Faculty of Theology, University of Pretoria.
http://www.hts.org.za
am2017
Centre for Contextual Ministry
Date
2017-05-19Type
ArticleIdentifier
oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/60565http://hdl.handle.net/2263/60565
Mahlangu, E., 2016,
 ‘Theology disrupted: Doing
 theology with children in
 African contexts’, HTS
 Teologiese Studies/
 Theological Studies 72(1),
 a3513. http://dx.DOI.
 org/ 10.4102/hts.v72i1.3513.
0259-9422 (print)
2072-8050 (online)
10.4102/hts.v72i1.3513