‘Uncrunching’ time: medical schools’ use of social media for faculty development
Keywords
faculty developmentsocial networking
collaboration
Web 2.0
time demands
Special aspects of education
LC8-6691
Education
L
DOAJ:Education
DOAJ:Social Sciences
Medicine (General)
R5-920
Medicine
R
DOAJ:Medicine (General)
DOAJ:Health Sciences
Special aspects of education
LC8-6691
Education
L
DOAJ:Education
DOAJ:Social Sciences
Medicine (General)
R5-920
Medicine
R
DOAJ:Medicine (General)
DOAJ:Health Sciences
Special aspects of education
LC8-6691
Education
L
Medicine (General)
R5-920
Medicine
R
Special aspects of education
LC8-6691
Education
L
Medicine (General)
R5-920
Medicine
R
Special aspects of education
LC8-6691
Education
L
Medicine (General)
R5-920
Medicine
R
Full record
Show full item recordAbstract
Purpose: The difficulty of attracting attendance for in-person events is a problem common to all faculty development efforts. Social media holds the potential to disseminate information asynchronously while building a community through quick, easy-to-use formats. The authors sought to document creative uses of social media for faculty development in academic medical centers. Method: In December 2011, the first author (P.S.C.) examined the websites of all 154 accredited medical schools in the United States and Canada for pages relevant to faculty development. The most popular social media sites and searched for accounts maintained by faculty developers in academic medicine were also visited. Several months later, in February 2012, a second investigator (C.W.S.) validated these data via an independent review. Results: Twenty-two (22) medical schools (14.3%) employed at least one social media technology in support of faculty development. In total, 40 instances of social media tools were identified – the most popular platforms being Facebook (nine institutions), Twitter (eight institutions), and blogs (eight institutions). Four medical schools, in particular, have developed integrated strategies to engage faculty in online communities. Conclusions: Although relatively few medical schools have embraced social media to promote faculty development, the present range of such uses demonstrates the flexibility and affordability of the tools. The most popular tools incorporate well into faculty members’ existing use of technology and require minimal additional effort. Additional research into the benefits of engaging faculty through social media may help overcome hesitation to invest in new technologies.Date
2013-06-01Type
ArticleIdentifier
oai:doaj.org/article:79226ba8633a4d6fa22ec7e1eaea5f0210.3402/meo.v18i0.20995
1087-2981
https://doaj.org/article/79226ba8633a4d6fa22ec7e1eaea5f02
Copyright/License
CC BYCollections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Transforming nursing education: a review of stressors and strategies that support students' professional socializationDel Prato D; Bankert E; Grust P; Joseph J (Dove Press, 2011-05-01)Darlene Del Prato1, Esther Bankert2, Patricia Grust1, Joanne Joseph31Department of Nursing and Health Professions; 2Provost; 3Department of Psychology, State University of New York, Institute of Technology, Utica, NY, USAAbstract: Nurse educators are facing the challenge of creating new ways of teaching and facilitating enhanced learning experiences in clinical practice environments that are inherently complex, highly demanding, and unpredictable. The literature consistently reports the negative effects of excess stress and unsupportive relationships on wellbeing, self-efficacy, self-esteem, learning, persistence, and success. However, understanding contributing factors of stress, such as the student's experiences of uncaring and oppressive interactions, is clearly not adequate. The transformation of nursing education requires a paradigm shift that embraces collegiality, collaboration, caring, and competence for students and the faculty. This paper reviews the literature on stress and its effects on nursing students. Grounded in theory related to stress and human caring, this paper focuses on the clinical environment and faculty-student relationships as major sources of students' stress and offers strategies for mitigating stress while fostering learning and professional socialization of future nurses.Keywords: stress, faculty-student relationships, stress management, caring learning environment, incivility
-
Medical students as human subjects in educational research – the importance of responder biasKieran Walsh (Co-Action, 2013-05-01)
-
Students’ perception of the learning environment in a distributed medical programmeKiran Veerapen; Sean McAleer (Co-Action, 2010-09-01)Background : The learning environment of a medical school has a significant impact on students’ achievements and learning outcomes. The importance of equitable learning environments across programme sites is implicit in distributed undergraduate medical programmes being developed and implemented. Purpose : To study the learning environment and its equity across two classes and three geographically separate sites of a distributed medical programme at the University of British Columbia Medical School that commenced in 2004. Method : The validated Dundee Ready Educational Environment Survey was sent to all students in their 2nd and 3rd year (classes graduating in 2009 and 2008) of the programme. The domains of the learning environment surveyed were: students’ perceptions of learning, students’ perceptions of teachers, students’ academic self-perceptions, students’ perceptions of the atmosphere, and students’ social self-perceptions. Mean scores, frequency distribution of responses, and inter- and intrasite differences were calculated. Results : The perception of the global learning environment at all sites was more positive than negative. It was characterised by a strongly positive perception of teachers. The work load and emphasis on factual learning were perceived negatively. Intersite differences within domains of the learning environment were more evident in the pioneer class (2008) of the programme. Intersite differences consistent across classes were largely related to on-site support for students. Conclusions : Shared strengths and weaknesses in the learning environment at UBC sites were evident in areas that were managed by the parent institution, such as the attributes of shared faculty and curriculum. A greater divergence in the perception of the learning environment was found in domains dependent on local arrangements and social factors that are less amenable to central regulation. This study underlines the need for ongoing comparative evaluation of the learning environment at the distributed sites and interaction between leaders of these sites.