Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Transforming nursing education: a review of stressors and strategies that support students' professional socializationDarlene Del Prato1, Esther Bankert2, Patricia Grust1, Joanne Joseph31Department of Nursing and Health Professions; 2Provost; 3Department of Psychology, State University of New York, Institute of Technology, Utica, NY, USAAbstract: Nurse educators are facing the challenge of creating new ways of teaching and facilitating enhanced learning experiences in clinical practice environments that are inherently complex, highly demanding, and unpredictable. The literature consistently reports the negative effects of excess stress and unsupportive relationships on wellbeing, self-efficacy, self-esteem, learning, persistence, and success. However, understanding contributing factors of stress, such as the student's experiences of uncaring and oppressive interactions, is clearly not adequate. The transformation of nursing education requires a paradigm shift that embraces collegiality, collaboration, caring, and competence for students and the faculty. This paper reviews the literature on stress and its effects on nursing students. Grounded in theory related to stress and human caring, this paper focuses on the clinical environment and faculty-student relationships as major sources of students' stress and offers strategies for mitigating stress while fostering learning and professional socialization of future nurses.Keywords: stress, faculty-student relationships, stress management, caring learning environment, incivility
-
Der Fragebogen &quot;SFDP26-German&quot;: Ein verlässliches Instrument zur Evaluation des klinischen Unterrichts? [The Questionnaire &quot;SFDP26-German&quot;: a reliable tool for evaluation of clinical teaching?][english] Aims: Evaluation of the effectiveness of clinical teaching is an important contribution for the quality control of medical teaching. This should be evaluated using a reliable instrument in order to be able to both gauge the status quo and the effects of instruction. In the Stanford Faculty Development Program (SFDP), seven categories have proven to be appropriate: Since 1998, the SFDP26 questionnaire has established itself as an evaluation tool in English speaking countries. To date there is no equivalent German-language questionnaire available which evaluates the overall effectiveness of teaching.Question: Methods: 19 anaesthetists (7 female, 12 male) from the University of Lübeck were evaluated at the end of a teaching seminar on emergency medical care using SFDP-German. The sample consisted of 173 medical students (119 female (68.8%) and 54 male (31.2%), mostly from the fifth semester (6.6%) and sixth semester (80.3%). The mean age of the students was 23±3 years. Results: The discriminatory power of all items ranged between good and excellent (r=0.48-0.75). All subscales displayed good internal consistency (α=0.69-0.92) and significant positive inter-scale correlations (r=0.40-0.70). The subscales and “overall effectiveness of teaching” showed significant correlation, with the highest correlation for the subscale “communication of goals (p&lt; 0.001; r = 0.61).Conclusion: The analysis of SFDP26-German confirms high internal consistency. Future research should investigate the effectiveness of the individual categories on the overall effectiveness of teaching and validate according to external criteria. <br>[german] Zielsetzung: Die Evaluation klinischer Lehrkompetenz ist ein wichtiger Beitrag zur Qualitätssicherung medizinischer Lehrveranstaltungen. Die Evaluation sollte mit einem verlässlichen Instrument durchgeführt werden, um Status quo sowie Effekte von medizindidaktischen Schulungsmaßnahmen beurteilen zu können. Im „Stanford Faculty Development Program“ (SFDP) haben sich folgende Aspekte als sinnvoll erwiesen: Als Evaluationsinstrument ist seit 1998 der Fragebogen „SFDP26“ im englischsprachigen Raum zur Erfassung dieser Kategorien etabliert. Bisher existiert kein gleichwertiges deutschsprachiges Instrument zur Überprüfung von Lehrkompetenz im klinischen Kontext.Fragestellung: Methodik: 19 Ärzte (w=7, m=12) der Klinik für Anästhesiologie an der Universität zu Lübeck wurden am Ende ihrer Lehrveranstaltungen zur Notfallmedizin durch Studierende mittels SFDP26-German evaluiert. Die Stichprobe setzte sich aus 173 Medizinstudierenden (w=119, bzw. 68.8%; m=54, 31.2%) des überwiegend fünften (6.6%) und sechsten Fachsemesters (80.3%) zusammen. Das durchschnittliche Alter der Studierenden betrug 23±3 Jahre. Ergebnisse: Die Trennschärfen der Items lagen alle in einem guten bis sehr guten Bereich (r=0.48-0.75). Alle Subskalen zeigten gute interne Konsistenzen (α=0.69-0.92) sowie signifikante positive Korrelationen (r=0.40-0.70) untereinander. Subskalen und „Gesamtlehreffektivität“ korrelierten signifikant (p&lt;0.001) und am höchsten für die Subskala „Zielkommunikation“ (r=0.61). Schlussfolgerungen: Die Analysen bestätigen dem „SFDP26-German“ eine hohe interne Konsistenz. Die Beleuchtung der Wirksamkeit der einzelnen Kategorien auf die Gesamtlehrleistung sowie eine Validierung anhand externer Kriterien sollte in Folgestudien erfolgen.
-
Response to Haskell's "Academic Freedom ... &amp; Student Evaluation"Haskell (1997) argued that the administrative practice of student evaluation of faculty is a threat to academic freedom. However, before that claim can be substantiated, several prior questions must be addressed: To whom does academic freedom belong? Individual faculty? The academy? Whose actions can violate the right? Can any lines be drawn based on whether the substance or form of classroom behavior is influenced? And still another crucial point is whether a body can violate academic freedom without any intent to interfere with or control the substance of what is said to students.