• English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • English 
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Journals AtoZ
  • Ideas y Valores
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Journals AtoZ
  • Ideas y Valores
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All of the LibraryCommunitiesPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsThis CollectionPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsProfilesView

My Account

Login

The Library

AboutNew SubmissionSubmission GuideSearch GuideRepository PolicyContact

Statistics

Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

The myth of concept publicity

  • CSV
  • RefMan
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • RefWorks
Author(s)
Duhau Girola, Laura
Keywords
G
Frege
concepts
concept individuation
publicity constraint
G
Frege
conceptos
individuación de conceptos
restricción relativa al carácter público

Full record
Show full item record
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/13162
Online Access
http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=3963635
Abstract
In this paper I defend the claim that concepts are not public. I argue that two of the main constraints for theories of concepts, namely (1) that concepts are public and (2) that they serve to explain Frege Cases, are in tension. (1) requires concepts to be individuated coarsely, while (2) requires concepts to be individuated finely. Thus, no theory of concepts can accommodate both (1) and (2). I argue that (2) is a non-negotiable constraint for theories of concepts, while (1) is negotiable. Therefore, theories of concepts should individuate concepts finely enough to solve Frege Cases, and claim that concepts are not public.
El artículo defiende la tesis de que los conceptos no tienen carácter público, argumentando que existe una tensión entre las dos restricciones principales a las teorías de los conceptos, a saber: (1) que los conceptos tienen carácter público y (2) que sirven para explicar casos fregeanos. La restricción (1) exige que los conceptos sean individuados burdamente, mientras que la (2) requiere que sean individuados finamente. En consecuencia, ninguna teoría de los conceptos puede satisfacer las dos restricciones. Se argumenta que la (2) es una restricción no negociable de las teorías de los conceptos, mientras que la (1) sí es negociable. Por lo tanto, las teorías de los conceptos deben individuarlos de manera suficientemente fina para resolver casos fregeanos, así como sostener que los conceptos no tienen carácter público.
Date
2012
Type
text (article)
Identifier
oai:dialnet.unirioja.es:ART0000483607
http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=3963635
(Revista) ISSN 0120-0062
Copyright/License
LICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: http://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: http://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
Collections
Ideas y Valores

entitlement

 
DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
Quick Guide | Contact Us
Open Repository is a service operated by 
Atmire NV
 

Export search results

The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.