Author(s)
Roose, RudiPP040019861408768010010904970000-0001-7508-4593Roets, GrietPP04001995459344801001686241
Schiettecat, TinekePP040000602759018020010586490000-0003-3470-8528
Pannecoucke, Barbara002002004925
Piessens, AnPP04801001456370
Van Gils, Jan
Op de Beeck, Hanne
Vandenhole, Wouter
Driessens, Kristel
Desair, Kristof
Hermans, Koen
van Robaeys, Bea
Vandenbroeck, MichelPP048010006121670000-0003-1448-1047
Vandekinderen, CarolinePP04002002243583802000339839
Keywords
Social Sciencespoverty
participation/citizenship
ethics
research
transparency
participatie/burgerschap
armoede
ethiek
onderzoek
transparantie
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/7262943/file/7262965Abstract
Social work research is inherently normative and as such the assumptions about social problems in social work research should be open to scrutiny and contestation. But although researchers often face tussles and huge contradictions, they rarely articulate them. In this article, we report on a small research project in which a collective of social work researchers in Flanders (the Dutch speaking part of Belgium) tried to think critically through some of the questions and complexities they were confronted with in social work research, more specifically in research on poverty. Our research aim implied that we tried to discuss the choices that were made during a diversity of research projects, including making explicit the grounds on which this happened. We learned that the choices made, although they seem to be very obvious ones, often remained implicit during the different research processes. We conclude that social work research requires that researchers attempt to realize a practice of transparency. The pursuit of such a practice of transparency refers to the importance of the creation of reflexive space in research communities to collectively embrace and discuss the complexities of social work research.Social work research is inherently normative and as such the assumptions about social problems in social work research should be open to scrutiny and contestation. But although researchers often face tussles and huge contradictions, they rarely articulate them. In this article, we report on a small research project in which a collective of social work researchers in Flanders (the Dutch speaking part of Belgium) tried to think critically through some of the questions and complexities they were confronted with in social work research, more specifically in research on poverty. Our research aim implied that we tried to discuss the choices that were made during a diversity of research projects, including making explicit the grounds on which this happened. We learned that the choices made, although they seem to be very obvious ones, often remained implicit during the different research processes. We conclude that social work research requires that researchers attempt to realize a practice of transparency. The pursuit of such a practice of transparency refers to the importance of the creation of reflexive space in research communities to collectively embrace and discuss the complexities of social work research.
A1
Date
2016Type
textIdentifier
oai:search.ugent.be:pug01:7262943https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/7262943/file/7262965