Viewing Research Participation as a Moral Obligation: In Whose Interests?

Author(s)
Rennie, Stuart
Keywords
Health
Research
Philosophical Ethics
Human Experimentation Policy Guidelines / Institutional Review Boards
Informed Consent or Human Experimentation

Full record
Show full item record
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/138493
Online Access
http://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=Viewing+research+participation+as+a+moral+obligation:+in+whose+interests?&title=The+Hastings+Center+report+&volume=41&issue=2&date=2011-03&au=Rennie,+Stuart
https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/hcr.2011.0025
http://hdl.handle.net/10822/1018536
Abstract
A moral paradigm shift has been proposed for participation in health-related research. It's not just a praiseworthy option, some say; it's a social obligation. Recasting research participation in this way would have global ramifications, however. Who ultimately stands to gain the most from it, and who has the most to lose?
Date
2016-01-09
Identifier
oai:repository.library.georgetown.edu:10822/1018536
doi:10.1353/hcr.2011.0025
The Hastings Center report 2011 Mar-Apr; 41(2): 40-7
http://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=Viewing+research+participation+as+a+moral+obligation:+in+whose+interests?&title=The+Hastings+Center+report+&volume=41&issue=2&date=2011-03&au=Rennie,+Stuart
http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/hcr.2011.0025
http://hdl.handle.net/10822/1018536
DOI
10.1353/hcr.2011.0025
Collections