Author(s)
Young, Mary-AnneKeywords
ResearchResearchers
Genetic Screening / Genetic Testing
Human Experimentation Policy Guidelines / Institutional Review Boards
Applied and Professional Ethics
Philosophy of the Health Professions
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=Ethical+tensions+in+genetic+counselling+research.&title=Monash+bioethics+review+&volume=29&issue=3&date=2011-03&au=Young,+Mary-Annehttps://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03351326
http://hdl.handle.net/10822/1018084
Abstract
Ethical tensions are recognised as part of the everyday practice of conducting research and practising genetic counselling. What are the conceptual frameworks that can assist researchers and genetic counsellors to deal with ethical tensions when conducting research? How might the overlap that arises from being a researcher and clinical genetic counsellor be dealt with? This article uses a case study to consider the ethical tensions between conducting research in genetic counselling and maintaining a clinical practice as a genetic counsellor. It examines the reconciliation of the dual roles of researcher and genetic counsellor. It explores conceptual frameworks that can combine the needs of ethical research practice, while maintaining ethical clinical practice.Date
2016-01-09Identifier
oai:repository.library.georgetown.edu:10822/1018084doi:10.1007/BF03351326
Monash bioethics review 2011 Mar; 29(3): 07.1-12
http://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=Ethical+tensions+in+genetic+counselling+research.&title=Monash+bioethics+review+&volume=29&issue=3&date=2011-03&au=Young,+Mary-Anne
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03351326
http://hdl.handle.net/10822/1018084
DOI
10.1007/BF03351326ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1007/BF03351326