• English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • English 
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • OAI Data Pool
  • OAI Harvested Content
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • OAI Data Pool
  • OAI Harvested Content
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All of the LibraryCommunitiesPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsThis CollectionPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsProfilesView

My Account

Login

The Library

AboutNew SubmissionSubmission GuideSearch GuideRepository PolicyContact

Statistics

Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

G183 Improving the patient pathway: aggregation of marginal gains in a secondary paediatric allergy service

  • CSV
  • RefMan
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • RefWorks
Author(s)
Eisen, S
van der Poel, L
Williams, C
Clough, L
Musial, M
Lowe, K
Walsh, O
Salt, P
Keywords
Trainees and Quality Improvement Session

Full record
Show full item record
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/1388006
Online Access
http://adc.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/99/Suppl_1/A80-a
https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2014-306237.187
Abstract
<sec><st>Aims</st> Our multidisciplinary paediatric allergy clinic often exceeded staff and session capacity, adversely impacting efficiency and patient and staff experiences. We therefore aimed to analyse and improve the ‘patient pathway’, from referral to treatment, of children referred to this secondary care paediatric allergy service. </sec> <sec><st>Methods</st> Data was collected over two months, using patient trackers, process templates, “waste walks” and service-user evaluation. Data was both quantitative (waiting times, staff activity, appointment duration, total clinic duration) and qualitative (patient and staff feedback). Multidisciplinary clinical and management engagement and service improvement techniques allowed fast-track changes to be implemented over the following three months. </sec> <sec><st>Results</st> During baseline data collection, 21 patients were seen per week with an average clinic visit of 2 hours. Nursing under-utilisation early in clinics was noted, leading to later “bottlenecks”, and 50% of clinics overran their scheduled duration. Qualitative data from patient surveys described dissatisfaction at long waits and suboptimal provision of patient information. Fast track changes included optimisation of clinic templates enabling nurse-led investigation of follow up patients prior to clinician review, co-located clinic rooms, new patient history proforma, appropriate patient information (pre-clinic letter, web-site, leaflets, information board) and engagement of service-users (“design a logo” competition, patient focus groups, sticker charts). Analysis shows a 15% increase (3 patients per clinic) in clinic capacity, with an average 17% reduction (20 min) in visit duration. Staff activity is more evenly distributed throughout the clinic session. A reduction in clinic end times is being realised. Preliminary reports of user experiences demonstrate improvements. Ongoing data collection suggests that the improvements are sustained, and these principles have been effectively applied in other outpatient settings. </sec> <sec><st>Conclusions</st> Using multiple small changes and a multidisciplinary approach, sustained and reproducible improvements to the outpatient experience can be achieved in a short period of time and in a cost-neutral manner. Staff report enhanced morale and unexpected gains from collaboration with other stakeholders, including mutual identification of opportunities for further service improvements. Focused clinical and managerial collaboration impacts positively on outcomes. </sec>
Date
2014-04-01
Type
TEXT
Identifier
oai:open-archive.highwire.org:archdischild:99/Suppl_1/A80-a
http://adc.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/99/Suppl_1/A80-a
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2014-306237.187
Copyright/License
Copyright (C) 2014, BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
Collections
OAI Harvested Content

entitlement

 
DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2022)  DuraSpace
Quick Guide | Contact Us
Open Repository is a service operated by 
Atmire NV
 

Export search results

The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.