• English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • English 
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Journals AtoZ
  • Persona y bioética
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Journals AtoZ
  • Persona y bioética
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All of the LibraryCommunitiesPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsThis CollectionPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsProfilesView

My Account

Login

The Library

AboutNew SubmissionSubmission GuideSearch GuideRepository PolicyContact

Statistics

Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

CLINICAL ETHICS: STATUS QUAESTIONIS

  • CSV
  • RefMan
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • RefWorks
Author(s)
Requena Meana,Pablo
Comoretto,Nunziata
Petrini,Carlo
Keywords
Clinical ethics
ethics
clinical
bioethics
professional-patient relations

Full record
Show full item record
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/14352
Online Access
http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0123-31222016000100003
Abstract
Clinical ethics refers to an emerging field in clinical medicine that focuses on the process of ethical decision-making in a clinical setting. It has developed as a result of a growing awareness that modern medicine - characterized by technological progress, cultural diversity and social challenges - is posing a range of new "ethical dilemmas" that medical science alone cannot solve. For this reason, clinical ethics is often linked to "ethics consultation," which consists of services provided by an individual ethicist, ethics team or committee to address the ethical issues involved in a specific clinical case. Although clinical ethics developed in the beginning mainly as a methodological analysis to arrive at a justification for clinical ethical decisions, it quickly has become clear that the difficulty in clinical decision-making is only one aspect of wider ethical problems pertaining to the doctor-patient relationship as a whole and, most likely, to the core value of the medical profession. The principles method is usually presented as the most popular methodological approach to an analysis of clinical cases. However, strong criticism of this model has been voiced, and other alternative approaches are referred to, such as the casuistry model. Recently, significant contributions have been made by narrative medicine and virtue ethics. According to these methodologies, sound anthropology and a good relationship with the sick person are key elements required of any person engaged in medical practice who aims to be genuinely appropriate from an ethical perspective.
Date
2016-01-01
Type
journal article
Identifier
oai:scielo:S0123-31222016000100003
http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0123-31222016000100003
Collections
Persona y bioética

entitlement

 
DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
Quick Guide | Contact Us
Open Repository is a service operated by 
Atmire NV
 

Export search results

The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.