Social sustainability: from environmental policy to sustainability?
Author(s)
Paedagogische Hochschule Schwaebisch Gmuend, Schwaebisch Gmuend (Germany)Ritt, Thomas (Kammer fuer Arbeiter und Angestellte fuer Wien, Wien (Austria)) (ed.)
Keywords
RELIGION05R - Sociology, social studies, welfare studies, social services
INTERCULTURAL COMMUNICATION
EU
ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY
SOCIAL FACTORS
SOCIAL POLICY
05R - Sociology, social studies, welfare studies, social services
CZECH REPUBLIC
PEDAGOGICS
FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY
LABOR
SOCIAL POLICY
INTERCULTURAL EDUCATION
EU
PROVISION FOR OLD AGE
HUMAN DIGNITY
GREAT BRITAIN
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
POLITICAL EDUCATION
POLAND
YOUTH WORK
EUROPEAN INTEGRATION
EUROPE
FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY
050 - Humanities, psychology and social sciences, general
ASEAN
CONSUMPTION
NETHERLANDS
EUROPEAN SOCIAL POLICY
WORKER PARTICIPATION
FUTURE
POST-SOCIALIST COUNTRYSUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10068/224103Abstract
Germany'Zahlreiche Staaten und Organisationen haben sich seit der UN-Konferenz fuer Umwelt und Entwicklung in Rio de Janeiro 1992 zum Leitbild der Nachhaltigkeit bekannt. Der Begriff der Nachhaltigkeit umfasst dabei drei Dimensionen: oekologische, oekonomische und soziale Nachhaltigkeit. Seitdem sind eine ganze Reihe von Nachhaltigkeitsentwuerfen, wie 'Zukunftsfaehiges Deutschland', 'Sustainable Netherlands', 'Towards Sustainable Europe' oder der 'Nationale Umweltplan' fuer Oesterreich, entstanden. Allen ist gemein, dass sie fast ausschliesslich umweltorientiert sind und die anderen Nachhaltigkeitsdimensionen kaum beruecksichtigen. So spielen etwa soziale Fragestellungen, wie Verteilungswirkungen, Beschaeftigung oder Qualitaet der Arbeit kaum eine Rolle. Anlaesslich der Folgekonferenz von Rio, die 2002 in Johannesburg stattfinden soll, werden nun neue Strategien entwickelt. Das eroeffnet die Moeglichkeit, erstmals alle Nachhaltigkeitsdimensionen zu beruecksichtigen. Zur Klaerung der Frage, inwieweit sich die Umweltpolitik auf dem Nachhaltigkeitspfad befindet, und wie insbesondere die soziale Dimension beruecksichtigt wird, sollte das Symposium 'Von der Umweltpolitik zur Nachhaltigkeit?' beitragen. Es wurde von der Abteilung Sozialpolitik und der Abteilung Umwelt und Verkehr der Arbeiterkammer Wien am 31.10.2001 veranstaltet, und hat, ohne den Anspruch auf Vollstaendigkeit zu erheben, eine ganze Reihe wichtiger Aspekte sozialer Nachhaltigkeit aufgezeigt. Dieser Band der 'Informationen zur Umweltpolitik' enthaelt alle Beitraege dieses Symposiums; er soll einen Beitrag zur besseren Integration sozialer Fragestellungen und somit der sozialen Dimension in eine umfassende Nachhaltigkeitsstrategie leisten.' (Textauszug). Inhaltsverzeichnis: Michel Biart: Social sustainability as part of the social agenda of the European Community (5-10); Sebastian Brandl: Konzepte sozialer Nachhaltigkeit im deutschen Diskurs (11-32); Kees Le Blansch: Linking the social and the environmental - some reflection on Dutch experiences (33-46); Eckart Hildebrand: Nachhaltige Entwicklung und Zukunft der Arbeit (47-65); Josef Woess: Nachhaltigkeit in der Sozialpolitik am Beispiel der Alterssicherung (67-77); Beate Littiq: Arbeitnehmerbeteiligung am Umweltschutz als ein Baustein sozialer Nachhaltigkeit (79-90); Karl Kollmann: Soziale Dimensionen beim Konsum: Der neue Waren- und Unternehmenstest (91-104); Martina Schuster: Persoenliche Kompetenz als Aspekt der sozialen Dimension nachhaltiger Entwicklung (105-116); Sepp Eisenriegler: Das Reparatur-und Service-Zentrum R.U.S.Z, ein Praxisbeispiel fuer soziale Nachhaltigkeit (117-122)
SIGLE
Available from SUB Hamburg(18)-B47475 / FIZ - Fachinformationszzentrum Karlsruhe / TIB - Technische Informationsbibliothek
DE
Date
2002Type
K;K - nullIdentifier
oai:hdl:10068/224103http://hdl.handle.net/10068/224103
Collections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Poverty and Social Impact Analysis (PSIA) : Reviewing the Link with In-Country Policy and Planning Processes - Synthesis ReportWorld Bank (World Bank, 2009-05-01)The synthesis report concerns to go beyond a summary of the country studies to provide lessons and recommendations on how to further improve Poverty and Social Impact Analysis (PSIA) effectiveness. To do so, it draws on findings from country case studies, the literature and recent internal Bank reviews (World Bank 2006, 2008) on PSIA. The synthesis is structured in three parts. Section two reviews the role of PSIA in country work drawing on internal guidance from the Bank and the wider literature. It introduces the PSIA framework and the main elements of an effective PSIA. Section two ends with a presentation of the review framework and the approach to sampling and methodology for the country studies. Section three presents the bulk of the review findings and lessons learned with a focus on lessons for embedding PSIA into country processes. Section four addresses the future of PSIA with recommendations aimed at: (i) improving the influence that PSIA has on policy and planning processes in-country, and (ii) ensuring that it is applied more routinely by partner governments and Bank programs.
-
Inclusive States : Social Policy and Structural InequalitiesDani, Anis A.; de Haan, Arjan (Washington, DC : World Bank, 2012-05-25)This series New Frontiers of Social Policy aims to promote social development through systematic attention to the underlying social context and the social outcomes of development interventions and public policy. It compels the reader to think of social policy in terms of increasing access to productive assets, infrastructure, and goods and services; strengthening governance and accountability; enabling the rights and obligations of citizens to promote equitable access to development opportunities; and managing the social dimensions of conflict, natural disasters, and climate change. It recognizes the central role of social policy in ensuring that development policies and programs are sustainable. This book series has been conceived and produced for the broader development community, rather than for social policy specialists alone. This book places particular emphasis on, and attempts to overcome, the underlying causes of structural inequalities whereby social groups based on ethnicity, race, tribe, gender, or cultural differences are systematically disadvantaged compared with other groups with which they coexist. These inequalities prevent many developing countries from realizing their full potential and may undermine the sustainability of development outcomes.
-
Analyzing the Effects of Policy
 Reforms on the Poor : An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of
 World Bank Support to Poverty and Social Impact AnalysesIndependent Evaluation Group (Washington, DC: World Bank, 2012-03-19)The current global financial and
 economic crises are likely to put enormous pressure on
 governments to respond with immediate measures and to
 undertake far-reaching reforms in the medium term, requiring
 a substantial increase in donor support. To protect the poor
 and enhance benefits to them, key policy reforms will need
 to be underpinned by systematic analysis of their expected
 poverty and social impacts. The World Bank's experience
 to date with the Poverty and Social Impact Analysis (PSIA)
 approach provides useful lessons for addressing these
 issues. Overall, implementation of the PSIA approach has had
 considerable limitations. There have been tensions between
 the various operational objectives assigned to PSIAs. The
 tensions concern inconsistencies between informing country
 and Bank policy decisions in a timely way and building
 country analytic capacity. PSIAs have had limited ownership
 by Bank staff and managers and have often not been
 effectively integrated into country assistance programs.
 Quality assurance, monitoring, and evaluation of the overall
 effectiveness of PSIAs have been weak. To improve
 PSIAs' effectiveness, this evaluation recommends that
 the Bank take measures to ensure that staff fully
 understands what the PSIA approach is and when to use it,
 clarify the operational objectives of each PSIA, and ensure
 that the approach and timeline adopted are aligned with
 those objectives. Quality assurance mechanisms should be
 strengthened to ensure that PSIAs are designed to achieve
 the intended effects.