Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVictor M. Verdejo
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-26T02:33:50Z
dc.date.available2019-10-26T02:33:50Z
dc.date.created2017-09-29 23:04
dc.date.issued2012-12-01
dc.identifieroai:doaj.org/article:9552727ffb3147b4b83f53e0f657f055
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.5007/1808-1711.2012v16n3p451
dc.identifier1414-4247
dc.identifier1808-1711
dc.identifierhttps://doaj.org/article/9552727ffb3147b4b83f53e0f657f055
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/1537521
dc.description.abstractParadigmatic cases of disagreement seem not to be compatible with a widespread kind of solution to Kripke’s celebrated Pierre puzzle. As a result, the classical puzzle about rational belief is shown to be also a puzzle about public disagreement/agreement phenomena. In this paper, I defend that the new public version of the puzzle is substantial and challenging and conclude that a full solution to Kripke’s considerations must offer a satisfactory account of both the rational and public character of belief attributions. I then argue that a notion of non-belief-individuating understanding is plausibly the key notion that would allow us to arrest both versions of the Pierre puzzle.
dc.languageEN
dc.languageFR
dc.languagePT
dc.languageES
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Santa Catarina
dc.relation.ispartofhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2012v16n3p451/25624
dc.relation.ispartofhttps://doaj.org/toc/1414-4247
dc.relation.ispartofhttps://doaj.org/toc/1808-1711
dc.sourcePrincipia: An International Journal of Epistemology, Vol 16, Iss 3, Pp 451-469 (2012)
dc.subjectPierre puzzle
dc.subjectrationality
dc.subjectdisagreement
dc.subjectcoordination
dc.subjectnon-belief-individuating understanding.
dc.subjectPhilosophy (General)
dc.subjectB1-5802
dc.subjectPhilosophy. Psychology. Religion
dc.subjectB
dc.subjectDOAJ:Philosophy
dc.subjectDOAJ:Philosophy and Religion
dc.titlePierre’s Rational and Public Beliefs
dc.typeArticle
ge.collectioncodeOAIDATA
ge.dataimportlabelOAI metadata object
ge.identifier.legacyglobethics:11679647
ge.identifier.permalinkhttps://www.globethics.net/gel/11679647
ge.lastmodificationdate2017-09-29 23:04
ge.lastmodificationuseradmin@pointsoftware.ch (import)
ge.submissions0
ge.oai.exportid148600
ge.oai.repositoryid52
ge.oai.setnameLCC:Philosophy (General)
ge.oai.setnameLCC:Philosophy. Psychology. Religion
ge.oai.setnameDOAJ:Philosophy
ge.oai.setnameDOAJ:Philosophy and Religion
ge.oai.setspecTENDOlBoaWxvc29waHkgKEdlbmVyYWwp
ge.oai.setspecTENDOlBoaWxvc29waHkuIFBzeWNob2xvZ3kuIFJlbGlnaW9u
ge.oai.setspecRE9BSjpQaGlsb3NvcGh5
ge.oai.setspecRE9BSjpQaGlsb3NvcGh5IGFuZCBSZWxpZ2lvbg~~
ge.oai.streamid2
ge.setnameGlobeEthicsLib
ge.setnameGlobeTheoLib
ge.setspecglobeethicslib
ge.setspecglobetheolib
ge.linkhttps://dx.doi.org/10.5007/1808-1711.2012v16n3p451
ge.linkhttps://doaj.org/article/9552727ffb3147b4b83f53e0f657f055


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record