• English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • English 
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • OAI Data Pool
  • OAI Harvested Content
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • OAI Data Pool
  • OAI Harvested Content
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All of the LibraryCommunitiesPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsThis CollectionPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsProfilesView

My Account

LoginRegister

The Library

AboutNew SubmissionSubmission GuideSearch GuideRepository PolicyContact

Promoting accountability with a new generation of logic models Promoviendo credibilidad con una nueva generación de modelos lógicos Promovendo credibilidade com uma nova geração de modelos lógicos

  • CSV
  • RefMan
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • RefWorks
Author(s)
Ann L. McCracken
Keywords
Instrumentos
Modelos lógicos
Evaluación
Instrumentos
Modelos lógicos
Avaliação
Tools
Logic models
Evaluation
Education (General)
L7-991
Education
L
DOAJ:Education
DOAJ:Social Sciences
Show allShow less

Full record
Show full item record
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/1548372
Online Access
https://doaj.org/article/0b82458f3e4c4cefa3804bdefc0c2202
Abstract
To better facilitate their work, program evaluators have developed a series of tools. One tool, the logic model, consists of inputs, activities, outputs, and outcomes. This article debates the adequacy of this commonly accepted logic model in evaluating the implementation of evidence-based practices in organizations. The author proposes a different logic model format which connects evidence and practice.<br>Los evaluadores de programas desarrollaron una serie de instrumentos para facilitar aún más sus trabajos. Un instrumento; el modelo lógico consiste de inputs, actividades, outputs y resultados. Este artículo discute la adecuación de este modelo lógico comúnmente aceptado en la evaluación y en la implementación de prácticas basadas en la evidencia en las organizaciones. El autor propone el formato de un modelo lógico diferente que conecta la evidencia práctica.<br>Os avaliadores de programas desenvolveram uma série de instrumentos para facilitar mais os seus trabalhos. Um instrumento; o modelo lógico consiste de inputs, atividades, outputs e resultados. Este artigo discute a adequação deste modelo lógico comumente aceito na avaliação e na implementação de práticas baseadas na evidência nas organizações. O autor propõe o formato de um modelo lógico diferente que conecta a evidência prática.
Date
2006-12-01
Type
Article
Identifier
oai:doaj.org/article:0b82458f3e4c4cefa3804bdefc0c2202
10.1590/S0104-40362006000400005
0104-4036
https://doaj.org/article/0b82458f3e4c4cefa3804bdefc0c2202
Collections
OAI Harvested Content

entitlement

 
DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2021)  DuraSpace
Quick Guide | Contact Us
Open Repository is a service operated by 
Atmire NV
 

Export search results

The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.