QUESTÃO SOCIAL HOJE : A RESISTÊNCIA UM ELEMENTO EM CONSTRUÇÃO (THE SOCIAL QUESTION TODAY: THE RESISTENCE AS EM ELEMENT IN CONSTRUCTION)
Author(s)
Selma Maria SchonsKeywords
Questão social. Pauperismo. Política. Reestruturação produtiva.Social sciences (General)
H1-99
Social Sciences
H
DOAJ:Social Sciences
Full record
Show full item recordAbstract
<p align="justify" ><b>Resumo:</b> Neste artigo trato da questão social que resulta da contradição das relações do Capital e Trabalho, inscrita no sistema que se afirmou com a revolução industrial e hoje tem novas manifestações na reestruturação produtiva. A questão social, basicamente composta dos elementos econômico e político, que se manifesta no pauperismo. Aquele que o percebe toma consciência e o denuncia, exigindo outro atendimento, ou seja, é o elemento da resistência, capaz de inscrever o problema da pobreza na agenda política. Entendo que na questão social, hoje, este elemento da resistência é um ser em construção. Para chegar a isso, situamos o que se convencionou chamar de “questão social clássica”, da metade do século XIX e se manifestou a partir da pauperização resultante da revolução industrial, ou seja, é a pobreza considerada como “filha da industrialização”. Quanto ao elemento político este se expressou na organização e formação da classe operária, seus sindicatos, os partidos políticos de esquerda, assumindo o protagonismo da questão social.Situar a questão social, hoje, é detectar as contradições que se manifestam a partir da reestruturação da produção, desde o final do último século e início deste, afirmado na versão da “mundialização financeira”. Flexibiliza e precariza as relações de trabalho o que causa um desemprego estrutural, porque os “desfiliados” do trabalho vulnerabilizam até mesmo os “estáveis”. Na questão social hoje há, portanto, novas manifestações da pobreza, a partir da reestruturação produtiva, mas os atores e sujeitos para denunciar esta situação e definir um projeto mais favorável, constituem um elemento ainda em construção.<br><br><b>Abstract:</b> In this article I take the social question as a result of the fight between Capital and Work, present today in the system affirmed as the industrial revolution and nowadays known as the productive reorganization. The social question, basically composed of the economic and political elements, now may by manifested as pauperism. That one that perceives it taking consciousness and denouncing it, demanding another attendance, becomes the element of resistance, capable to inscribe this problem in the political agenda.I understand that in the social question today this element of the resistance is in construction. To arrive to this we point out what in the past was called “the classic social question” (XIX th. Century), from the resultant pauperism of the industrial revolution. We consider pauperism as “the son of industrialization”. Considering the political elements itis expressed in the organization and formation of the labor class, their unions, the left political parties, assuming the protagonism of the social question. To point out the social question today we have to detect the contradictions wich are revealed from the reorganization of the production, since the end of the last century and the beginning of the present, affirmed in the version of the “mundialização financeira”. It makes flexible and turns unsafe the work relations causing a structural unemployment, because “unloked” of the work weaken the “steady ones even though”.In the social question today there are, therefore, new manifestations of poverty, from the productive reorganization, but the actors and citizens to denounce this situation and to define a more favorable project, is an element still in construction.</p>Date
2007-01-01Type
ArticleIdentifier
oai:doaj.org/article:3d3b8a4541ab4a80bf0b5acf732ac9731519-7611
1982-7814
https://doaj.org/article/3d3b8a4541ab4a80bf0b5acf732ac973
Collections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Social Protection in Low Income Countries and Fragile Situations : Challenges and Future DirectionsOvadiya, Mirey; Zampaglione, Giuseppe; Das, Maitreyi; Andrews, Colin; Elder, John (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2013-05-28)Demand for social protection is growing in low income countries and fragile situations. In recent years, the success of social protection (SP) interventions in middle income countries (MICs) like Brazil and Mexico, along with the series of food, fuel, and financial crises, has prompted policymakers in low income countries (LICs) and fragile situations (FSs) to examine the possibility of introducing such programs in their own countries. Flagship programs in countries as diverse as Ethiopia, India, Pakistan, and Rwanda have shown the adaptability of social protection interventions to the LIC context. Yet, despite growing levels of support for these initiatives, many challenges remain. In LICs and FSs, governments are confronted with a nexus of mutually reinforcing deficits that increase the need for SP programs and simultaneously reduce their ability to successfully respond. Governments face hard choices about the type, affordability, and sustainability of SP interventions. The paper reviews how these factors affect SP programs in these countries and identifies ways to address the deficits. It supports the establishment of resilient SP systems to address specific needs and vulnerabilities and to respond flexibly to both slow and sudden onset crises. To achieve this, both innovation and pragmatism are required in three strategic areas: (i) building the basic blocks of SP systems (e.g., targeting, payments, and monitoring and evaluation); (ii) ensuring financial sustainability; and (iii) promoting good governance and transparency. These issues suggest the possibility of a different trajectory in the development of social protection in LICs than in MICs. The implications for World Bank support include the need to focus on increasing knowledge and operational effectiveness of SP programs, fostering institutional links between multiple SP programs, and using community capacity and technological innovations to overcome bottlenecks in operations.
-
Managing Risk, Promoting GrowthWorld Bank (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2016-02-08)A growing body of evidence demonstrates
 that individuals and households experience a range of
 positive outcomes from social protection. Social protection
 increases productivity and growth. Countries can realize
 significant benefits by creating an integrated social
 protection system. Social protection is affordable in
 low-income countries despite tight budgets. While overall
 spending on social protection in Africa remains low by
 international standards, experience suggests that social
 protection programs can achieve national coverage at the
 cost of only 1 to 2 percent of gross domestic product (GDP).
 While this is only a portion of the financing required to
 operate a social protection system, it draws attention to
 what countries can achieve in the short-term. Indeed, one
 way in which existing social protection spending can be made
 significantly more efficient would be by reallocating
 existing financing for inefficient subsidies and ad hoc
 emergency food aid to predictable safety nets. At the same
 time, pursuing reforms to social security systems will
 ensure their fiscal sustainability, while expanding
 coverage. Notably, the costs of not protecting poor families
 are very high, are borne disproportionately by women and
 children, and undermine the productivity of future
 generations. The Strategy will be implemented by leveraging
 partnerships, knowledge, and the World Bank's financing
 instruments. The World Bank will continue to invest in
 analytical work to fill knowledge gaps and promote an
 evidence-based dialogue for social protection systems in
 Africa and further innovation. It will work with governments
 to build country-owned national social protection systems
 with the aim of reducing fragmentation in the sector. The
 Bank also will pay particular attention to institutional
 development and capacity building by using its lending to
 increase the coverage of successful social protection
 interventions. Throughout this work, the Bank will work in
 coordination with governments, development partners, the
 private sector, academics, civil society, and beneficiaries.
-
8. PARTITE POLITIKE, Pjesa E Dyte, LEKSIONE MBI POLITIKEN8. PARTITE POLITIKE, Pjesa E Dyte, LEKSIONE MBI POLITIKEN