Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorClemence Due
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-26T04:16:06Z
dc.date.available2019-10-26T04:16:06Z
dc.date.created2017-09-29 23:31
dc.date.issued2011-04-01
dc.identifieroai:doaj.org/article:c0c362d1a7d1498f9bba5654e6aed588
dc.identifier1836-5132
dc.identifierhttps://doaj.org/article/c0c362d1a7d1498f9bba5654e6aed588
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/1586572
dc.description.abstractIn early October 2009, a blackface parody of the Jackson Five performed on the Hey Hey It’s Saturday reunion reached not only an audience of over 2.5 million people in Australia, but also millions of people around the world after guest judge Harry Connick Jr accused the skit and the show of racism. The incident was widely discussed within various online communities, and whilst widely condemned internationally, online comment sections and responses to online newspaper polls suggested that the overwhelming opinion within Australia was that the skit was not racist. This paper considers the way in which such denials of racism were performed in online comments to a number of newspaper articles and polls.
dc.languageEN
dc.publisherUniversity of Melbourne
dc.relation.ispartofhttp://journals.culture-communication.unimelb.edu.au/platform/v3i1_due.html
dc.relation.ispartofhttps://doaj.org/toc/1836-5132
dc.sourcePlatform: Journal of Media and Communication, Vol 3, Iss 1, Pp 36-53 (2011)
dc.subjectCommunication. Mass media
dc.subjectP87-96
dc.subjectPhilology. Linguistics
dc.subjectP1-1091
dc.subjectLanguage and Literature
dc.subjectP
dc.subjectDOAJ:Media and communication
dc.subjectDOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.title“AUSSIE HUMOUR” OR RACISM? HEY HEY IT’S SATURDAY AND THE DENIAL OF RACISM IN ONLINE RESPONSES TO NEWS MEDIA ARTICLES
dc.typeArticle
ge.collectioncodeOAIDATA
ge.dataimportlabelOAI metadata object
ge.identifier.legacyglobethics:11730706
ge.identifier.permalinkhttps://www.globethics.net/gel/11730706
ge.lastmodificationdate2017-09-29 23:31
ge.lastmodificationuseradmin@pointsoftware.ch (import)
ge.submissions0
ge.oai.exportid148600
ge.oai.repositoryid52
ge.oai.setnameLCC:Communication. Mass media
ge.oai.setnameLCC:Philology. Linguistics
ge.oai.setnameLCC:Language and Literature
ge.oai.setnameDOAJ:Media and communication
ge.oai.setnameDOAJ:Social Sciences
ge.oai.setspecTENDOkNvbW11bmljYXRpb24uIE1hc3MgbWVkaWE~
ge.oai.setspecTENDOlBoaWxvbG9neS4gTGluZ3Vpc3RpY3M~
ge.oai.setspecTENDOkxhbmd1YWdlIGFuZCBMaXRlcmF0dXJl
ge.oai.setspecRE9BSjpNZWRpYSBhbmQgY29tbXVuaWNhdGlvbg~~
ge.oai.setspecRE9BSjpTb2NpYWwgU2NpZW5jZXM~
ge.oai.streamid2
ge.setnameGlobeEthicsLib
ge.setspecglobeethicslib
ge.linkhttps://doaj.org/article/c0c362d1a7d1498f9bba5654e6aed588


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record