É possível uma política deliberativa para o trabalho? Is it possible a deliberative politics in labor?
Author(s)Leonardo Mello e Silva
Industrial and labor relations
Political science (General)
DOAJ:Law and Political Science
Full recordShow full item record
AbstractAs relações trabalhistas vêm apresentando uma série de iniciativas de negociação inovadoras nos últimos anos no Brasil, seja no âmbito da concertação social, seja no âmbito das relações de trabalho dentro das fábricas, que apontam para a mobilização de uma postura dialógica e compreensiva entre os interlocutores ou atores coletivos. Os limites de uma tal postura em uma situação de conflito de classe estão para ser estabelecidos. O artigo procura incorporar a discussão teórica sobre a democracia deliberativa para aquele tipo de situação, a fim de testar a sua pertinência. A ênfase recai na observação das precondições teóricas quanto à arbitragem dos conflitos em situações determinadas, extraídas de pesquisa prévia do autor. A hipótese subjacente é de que o procedimento deliberativo no trabalho pode estar a indicar um alargamento da esfera pública no Brasil.<br>Industrial relations in Brazil have been presenting nowadays a series of innovative negotiations coming from the initiative of collective actors themselves either on the macro social concertation level as well as on labor relations at the plant micro level. These initiatives point to the incorporation and use of a dialogic and comprehensive approach between interlocutors based on the deliberative democracy’s analytical body. The limits of such approach in the classical class conflict situations are still to be theoretically stood. This paper aims to make use of that intellectual and academic tool in order to understand practical situations and then testing the accuracy of the tentative use of that tool itself to specific and concrete topics of sociological research. Underlying the paper is the idea that the deliberative procedure on the work’s world is a way to enlarge public sphere in Brazil.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
A look at S&T Awareness - Enhancements in IndiaChandra Mohan Nautiyal (SISSA, Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati, 2008-06-01)Basing mainly on author's direct involvement in some science communication efforts in India, and other reports, this contribution depicts and analyses the present science communication/ popularization scenario in India. It tries to dispel a myth that rural people don't require or don’t crave for S&T information. It discusses need for science and technology communication, sustaining curiosity and creating role models. Citing cases of some natural, 'unnatural' and organized events, it recounts how S&T popularization efforts have fared during the past decade and a half. It's made possible using print, AV and interactive media which, at times, require lot of financial inputs. However, this contribution shows that a number of natural and other phenomena can be used to convince people about power of S&T and in molding their attitude. The cases cited may be from India, but, with a little variation, are true for most of the developing and under- developed societies.
İsrail Devleti’nin İlanından Önce David Ben-Gurion’un Filistin’i Yahudileştirme PolitikasıHalil Erdemir (Gazi University, 2011-06-01)Ben Gurion argued that legal and official status can be paved the way to the Jewishautonomy in Palestine and its area. This can be achieved by the increase of Jewish populationwhich would improve to defend the rights and legal status of Jewish desires within the OttomanState. He believed that the Jewish interests only be saved and protected within the Turkishinstitutions by skilled and knowledgeable Jews who are competent of Turkish language, culture,law and politics. Ben Gurion studied law in Istanbul University in order to materialize whathe was arguing and defending for the Jewish nation.Ben Gurion encouraged and regardedabsolutely necessary to optain Osmanlı passports for those foreign Jewish nationals whomigrated to Palestine. He changed his support of Osmanlıs’ war effort depending on changingcircumstances during the WWI. At the beginning of the War he was supporting Germany andthe Ottoman State whereas Great Britain and its allies towards the end.The paper concentratedon David Ben-Gurion’s ideas and arguments on how to Jewishization of Palestine before theproclamation of the Israeli State.
Klasik Dönemde Osmanlılarda Devlet Yönetim Anlayışına Dair Bazı DüşüncelerAbdüllatif Armağan (Gazi University, 2011-12-01)The Ottoman Empire, a Turco-Islamic state, developed a combined organisation of state, depending on the laws of Islam, traditions and the former applications of state on the conquered lands. The chief concern of the Ottoman administrative structure was to extend the supreme authority of the Sultan. The central and provincial administration and the Army were submitted to the Sultan’s absolute authority. The Ottoman rule at the centre was composed of the Sultan and the Sultan’s Palace. The official centre of administration consisted of the Sultan, the Grand Vizier, the Palace, the Divan- Hümayun and the Army. Additionally, the Kul System flourished the Sultan’s realm in the remote areas of the Empire. This study touches upon both information and some thoughts on the inital state organisation and functions of the Empire, its state concept and administration, law, central administration, Divan-ı Hümayun, the Tımar(fief) and the Kul Systems in the Ottoman Classical Age.