• English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • English 
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • OAI Data Pool
  • OAI Harvested Content
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • OAI Data Pool
  • OAI Harvested Content
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All of the LibraryCommunitiesPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsThis CollectionPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsProfilesView

My Account

Login

The Library

AboutNew SubmissionSubmission GuideSearch GuideRepository PolicyContact

Statistics

Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

網路化檔案評量環境下教學者評、學生自評與同儕 互評之信效度比較 Comparisons of Reliability and Validity among Instructor Assessment, Student Self-Assessment and Peer-Assessment under Web-Based Portfolio Assessment Environment

  • CSV
  • RefMan
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • RefWorks
Author(s)
Chi-Cheng Chang
Ming-Fun Wu
Keywords
Bibliography. Library science. Information resources
Z
DOAJ:Library and Information Science
DOAJ:Social Sciences
Information technology
T58.5-58.64
Industrial engineering. Management engineering
T55.4-60.8
Technology (General)
T1-995
Technology
T
DOAJ:Computer Science
DOAJ:Technology and Engineering
Show allShow less

Full record
Show full item record
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/1614263
Online Access
https://doaj.org/article/eb403e36b77e4636883be944e4cf9bee
Abstract
本研究比較網路化檔案評量環境下教學者評、學生自評與同儕互評的信效度。研究樣本為某高職二年級修習「計算機應用」課程的七十二位學生。學生使用網路化檔案評量系統進行檔案的製作、觀摩、自評與同儕互評,教師透過系統檢視學生的檔案並評量其學習表現。在三種評量結果之間差異上,教學者評、學生自評、同儕互評三種評量結果有顯著差異,其中教學者評量最為嚴格、其次為學生自評,同儕互評最為寬鬆。在三種評量結果之間一致性上,僅自評與教師評之間具一致性。自評與同儕互評之間、同儕互評與教學者評之間,都不具一致性。在三種評量結果與測驗成績一致性上,教學者評分結果與測驗成績具高度一致性,學生自評與測驗成績亦具高度一致性;而同儕互評結果與測驗成績一致性低。<br>This study compares the reliable and validity among instructor assessment, student self-assessment and peer-assessment under the Web-based portfolio assessment environment. The research samples consist of 72 students who take “Computer Application” course of the second grade in some vocational high school. The students use the Web-based portfolio assessment system for creating their portfolio, emulating peers’ portfolio, and performing self-assessment and peer-assessment. The teacher uses the system for reviewing and assessing students’ learning performances. In regard to the difference among the three assessment approaches, there exists a significant difference among the three approaches. Instructor assessment is most rigorous, while peer-assessment is most slack. In regard to the correlation among the three assessment approaches, there exists a significant consistency between self-assessment and instructor assessment. There exist inconsistencies between self-assessment and peer-assessment as well as peer-assessment and instructor assessment. In regard to the correlation among the three assessment results and test score, there exist a high consistency between instructor assessment and test score. As well, there exist a high consistency between self-assessment and test score. However, the consistency between peer-assessment and test score is inadequate.
Date
2011-09-01
Type
Article
Identifier
oai:doaj.org/article:eb403e36b77e4636883be944e4cf9bee
1013-090X
https://doaj.org/article/eb403e36b77e4636883be944e4cf9bee
Collections
OAI Harvested Content

entitlement

 
DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2022)  DuraSpace
Quick Guide | Contact Us
Open Repository is a service operated by 
Atmire NV
 

Export search results

The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.