• English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • English 
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Globethics User Collection
  • Globethics Library Submissions
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Globethics User Collection
  • Globethics Library Submissions
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All of the LibraryCommunitiesPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsThis CollectionPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsProfilesView

My Account

Login

The Library

AboutSearch GuideContact

Statistics

Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

Critique and methodology

  • CSV
  • RefMan
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • RefWorks
Thumbnail
Name:
n22-4-pp305-322_JETS.pdf
Size:
2.009Mb
Format:
PDF
Download
Author(s)
Osborne, Grant R.
Keywords
Criticism
methodology
redaction criticism
evangelical criticism
GE Subjects
Biblical Theology
Old Testament
New Testament
Biblical hermeneutics, Interpretation of the Bible
Biblical Theologies

Full record
Show full item record
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/163078
Abstract
"In previous issues of this journal this writer has published two articles that attempted a positive reappraisal of redaction-critical methodology for the evangelical. The first' sought to come to grips with the synoptic problem—i. e., the differences in wording and content between the evangelists. As a test case I chose the great commission of Matt 28:16-20, especially the triadic baptismal vormula of v 19. The reason for this choice was the fact that it was one of the few logia Jesu with parallels in the rest of the NT and therefore had an external con- trol. The second article2 attempted to grapple with the critical side of redactional research: tradition criticism. In it I sought to critique the negative presupposi- tions of the radical critics and to determine both the positive value of the disci- pline and the controls that the NT itself places on the use of the tools."
Date
1979
Type
Article
Copyright/License
With permission of the license/copyright holder
Collections
Globethics Library Submissions

entitlement

 
DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2025)  DuraSpace
Quick Guide | Contact Us
Open Repository is a service operated by 
Atmire NV
 

Export search results

The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.