• English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
  • español 
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
  • Login
Ver ítem 
  •   Página de inicio
  • OAI Data Pool
  • OAI Harvested Content
  • Ver ítem
  •   Página de inicio
  • OAI Data Pool
  • OAI Harvested Content
  • Ver ítem
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Listar

Todo Globethics.net LibraryComunidadesPor fecha de publicaciónTítulosEsta colecciónPor fecha de publicaciónTítulosProfilesView

Mi cuenta

AccederRegistro

The Library

AboutNew SubmissionSubmission GuideSearch GuideRepository PolicyContact

Fluency or Accuracy - Two Different ‘Colours’ in Writing Assessment

  • CSV
  • RefMan
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • RefWorks
Author(s)
Listyani Listyani
Keywords
fluency, content, accuracy, grammar, Academic Writing
Education (General)
L7-991
Language and Literature
P
Philology. Linguistics
P1-1091

Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítem
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/1642238
Online Access
https://doaj.org/article/0f45a4c9bdb34dd9a70641a0f76f8708
Abstract
Fluency and accuracy. These two things have victoriously won many teachers’ attention at tertiary level. In the case of writing, these two remain debatable, and have always attracted many people, both lecturers’ and students’ attention. These language production measures have distracted many lecturers’ concentration: should they be faithful to fluency of ideas, or grammatical and language accuracy in correcting students’ essays? This paper tries to present the classical yet never-ending dilemmatic conflicts within the area of writing assessment. This debate still remains interesting to follow. Data were gained from close observation on documents, that is, 21 students’ essays and interviews with 2 students of Academic Writing in Semester II, 2015-2016. Four writing lecturers were also interviewed for their intellectual and critical opinions on these dilemmatic problems in assessing writing. Discussion results of FGD (Forum Group Discussion) involving all writing lecturers at the English Education Study Program at the Faculty of Language and Literature of Satya Wacana Christian University which were held in June, 2016, were also included as source of data. Hopefully, this paper gives a little more “colour” in the area of writing assessment, and gives a little enlightenment for other writing lecturers.   DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.2016.190201
Date
2017-01-01
Type
Article
Identifier
oai:doaj.org/article:0f45a4c9bdb34dd9a70641a0f76f8708
1410-7201
2579-9533
https://doaj.org/article/0f45a4c9bdb34dd9a70641a0f76f8708
Colecciones
OAI Harvested Content

entitlement

 
DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2019)  DuraSpace
Quick Guide | Contacto
Open Repository is a service operated by 
Atmire NV
 

Export search results

The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.