• English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • English 
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Globethics User Collection
  • Globethics Library Submissions
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Globethics User Collection
  • Globethics Library Submissions
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All of the LibraryCommunitiesPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsThis CollectionPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsProfilesView

My Account

Login

The Library

AboutSearch GuideContact

Statistics

Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

Antara “Penodaan” dan “Kerukunan”

  • CSV
  • RefMan
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • RefWorks
Thumbnail
Name:
Makalah_Posisi_CRCS-UGM_-_UU_N ...
Size:
195.7Kb
Format:
PDF
Download
Author(s)
Bagir, Zainal Abidin
Cholil, Suhadi
Rahayu, Mustaghfiroh
Amin, Ali
Keywords
legal ethics
Indonesian ethics
GE Subjects
Religious ethics
Comparative religion and interreligious dialogue

Full record
Show full item record
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/175423
Abstract
This article is a result of research study conducted by Center for Religious and Cross-cultural Studies (CRCS), Graduate School, Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia. It is a response and a contribution of thought to the process of judicial review on the position of “UU No.1/PNPS/1965” (it is a regulation issued by President to prevent a disgracing action). There are two main ideas in this article. Firstly, this research offers a broader perspective of problems of religious diversities in Indonesia. Law, one of perspectives, is an important factor to manage a democratic and multicultural society but it should not be the only way or the first choice to bring religious life in a better way. To take an easy way by claiming a religious case as “disgracing” or “out of track” is to deny a dialogical consensus within society. Secondly, this article suggests that UU No.1/PNPS/1965 should be invalidated for some contradictory implications within the law such as the problem of interpretation, religious authority, and discrimination.
Date
2010
Type
Conference proceedings
ISBN
9786029625707
Copyright/License
With permission of the license/copyright holder
Collections
Globethics Library Submissions

entitlement

 
DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2025)  DuraSpace
Quick Guide | Contact Us
Open Repository is a service operated by 
Atmire NV
 

Export search results

The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.