• English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • English 
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Globethics User Collection
  • Globethics Library Submissions
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Globethics User Collection
  • Globethics Library Submissions
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All of the LibraryCommunitiesPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsThis CollectionPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsProfilesView

My Account

Login

The Library

AboutSearch GuideContact

Statistics

Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

Second Circuit says CO2 is a nuisance

  • CSV
  • RefMan
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • RefWorks
Thumbnail
Name:
elq37_2_13_goetz_2010_0630.pdf
Size:
65.70Kb
Format:
PDF
Download
Author(s)
Goetz, David
Keywords
greenhouse effect
climate ethics
emissions
law
GE Subjects
Political ethics
Environmental ethics
Ethics of law
Rights based legal ethics
Resources ethics

Full record
Show full item record
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/175829
Abstract
"In Connecticut v. American Electric Power Co., the Second Circuit ruled that federal courts were competent to deal with tort claims against emitters of greenhouse gases. Although the plaintiffs in this suit only sought injunctive relief in the form of a cap and mandated reductions of greenhouse gas emissions, the court’s ruling exposes the nation’s utility companies to billions of dollars worth of liability In 2005, eight states, one municipality, and three land trusts brought suit against the five largest greenhouse gas emitters in the country on the theory that their emissions, amounting to 10 percent of all greenhouse gases emitted in the United States, constituted a public nuisance. The district court granted defendants’ summary judgment motion, holding that the suit raised political questions beyond the court’s jurisdiction. On appeal, the Second Circuit reversed the district court’s finding of a nonjusticiable political question, and held that plaintiffs had standing, that plaintiffs had properly stated a federal common law nuisance claim, and that existing federal regulation did not displace such claims." (p. 1)
Date
2010
Type
Article
Copyright/License
With permission of the license/copyright holder
Collections
Globethics Library Submissions
Climate Ethics

entitlement

 
DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2025)  DuraSpace
Quick Guide | Contact Us
Open Repository is a service operated by 
Atmire NV
 

Export search results

The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.