• English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • English 
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Globethics User Collection
  • Globethics Library Submissions
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Globethics User Collection
  • Globethics Library Submissions
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All of the LibraryCommunitiesPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsThis CollectionPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsProfilesView

My Account

Login

The Library

AboutSearch GuideContact

Statistics

Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

Directed organ donation

  • CSV
  • RefMan
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • RefWorks
Thumbnail
Name:
EJAIB52011.pdf
Size:
1.167Mb
Format:
PDF
Download
Author(s)
Yoshida, Masayuki
Keywords
organ transplantation
fairness
GE Subjects
Bioethics
Medical ethics
Health ethics

Full record
Show full item record
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/178400
Abstract
"In light of organ donation and transplantation, there are two distinctive features between Japan and Western countries. One would be that the rate of organ donation and transplants in Japan is extremely low. In comparison with the United Kingdom which adopts the opt-in system of organ donation, for instance, the number of those who register organ donation in Japan is merely one tenth and that of transplant practices in 2009, for example, was one twentieth [1] (Japan Organ Transplant Network [2]; NHS Blood and Transplant [3]). [4] Although the reason for such distinctive numerical differences can be argued by a variety of viewpoints, this controversial topic was discussed in a previous essay (Yoshida 2004). The other two features would be that the concept of directed organ donation was uniquely legalized in the revised version of Law on Organ Transplant (Law No. 86. 2009) under which priority donations among family members was permitted from the 17 January 2010. The first case under the revised law is that of a wife of a man who had died of stomach cancer on the 21 May 2010 received one of his corneas by an hour-and-half transplant operation carried out on the last day of May 2010 (Daily Yomiuri [5]; Mainichi Shinbun [6]). According to principles of justice and equity and to standards of the greatest medical need, organs from deceased donors have been distributed to potential recipients on a waiting list of relevant organs, although the Western countries have the differing opt-in system and opt-out one in dealing with the intention to donate organs. Therefore the equal and impartial allocation of organs engages prohibiting discrimination, unrelated to medical concern of life or death, on the basis of sex, age, ethnic origin, races, sexual orientation, colour of skin, religious, etc."(pg 99)
Date
2011-05
Type
Article
Copyright/License
With permission of the license/copyright holder
Collections
Globethics Library Submissions

entitlement

 
DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2025)  DuraSpace
Quick Guide | Contact Us
Open Repository is a service operated by 
Atmire NV
 

Export search results

The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.