Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAndreas Hoffmann
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-23T13:05:37Z
dc.date.available2019-09-23T13:05:37Z
dc.date.created2017-09-28 23:23
dc.date.issued2013-01-01
dc.identifieroai:doaj.org/article:6b4c894064be4e0c96e8ec2a64644d24
dc.identifier0259-9422
dc.identifier2072-8050
dc.identifier10.4102/hts.v69i1.1923
dc.identifierhttps://doaj.org/article/6b4c894064be4e0c96e8ec2a64644d24
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/18266
dc.description.abstractIt is one fundamental conviction of ancient philosophy that, in contrast to the vast majority, only few are able to gain knowledge of truth. This axiom, which also underlies Cicero’s <em>Hortensius</em>, is adapted by the young Augustine. When looking for a concept of truth that combines the ideal of a philosophical existence with Christianity, he decides to join the Manichaeans. As opposed to the ‘mainline church’ of the <em>catholica</em> in which ‘the many’ are gathered, the Manichaeans appear to him as a small, elitist Christian community meeting higher intellectual as well as ethical demands. This claim seems to be particularly and impressively confirmed by the ‘<em>pauci electi</em>’. Their approach has apparently strengthened Augustine’s belief that true, higher Christianity is to be found amongst the Manichaeans. When he later devotes himself to the <em>catholica</em> and leads the fight against the Manichaeans, Augustine adheres to the conviction of the ‘few wise’. Also within the <em>catholica</em> only few attain maximum insight and lead an appropriate life. At the same time, however, Augustine increasingly considers ‘the many’ as positive. These two aspects are combined in his epistemological concept of ‘<em>auctoritas</em>’: by means of their <em>auctoritas</em>, the few ‘wise’ within the Catholic Church are supposed to guide the many towards truth on their journey of faith and cause them to improve their moral conduct. Its big success is a major argument for the <em>catholica</em>, whilst the ‘<em>paucitas</em>’ of the Manichaeans (and all heretics) can be considered evidence of the groundlessness and absurdity of their doctrine.
dc.languageAF
dc.languageEN
dc.languageNL
dc.publisherAOSIS
dc.relation.ispartofhttp://www.hts.org.za/index.php/HTS/article/view/1923
dc.relation.ispartofhttps://doaj.org/toc/0259-9422
dc.relation.ispartofhttps://doaj.org/toc/2072-8050
dc.sourceHTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies , Vol 69, Iss 1, Pp e1-e6 (2013)
dc.subjectAugustine
dc.subjectManichaeism
dc.subjectFew and many
dc.subjectCicero
dc.subjectHortensius
dc.subjectThe Bible
dc.subjectBS1-2970
dc.subjectPractical Theology
dc.subjectBV1-5099
dc.titleThe few and the many: A motif of Augustine’s controversy with the Manichaeans
dc.typeArticle
ge.collectioncode0259-9422
ge.dataimportlabelOAI metadata object
ge.identifier.legacyglobethics:11556984
ge.identifier.permalinkhttps://www.globethics.net/gtl/11556984
ge.lastmodificationdate2017-09-28 23:23
ge.lastmodificationuseradmin@pointsoftware.ch (import)
ge.submissions0
ge.oai.exportid149001
ge.oai.repositoryid52
ge.oai.setnameLCC:The Bible
ge.oai.setnameLCC:Practical Theology
ge.oai.setspecTENDOlRoZSBCaWJsZQ~~
ge.oai.setspecTENDOlByYWN0aWNhbCBUaGVvbG9neQ~~
ge.oai.streamid5
ge.setnameGlobeTheoLib
ge.setspecglobetheolib
ge.linkhttps://doaj.org/article/6b4c894064be4e0c96e8ec2a64644d24


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record