Responsabilitat Social Corporativa comparada en xarxes socials de participació oberta i mitjans de comunicació: passat, present i futur
Author(s)
Turón Viñas, JosepKeywords
RSC; xarxes socials; Facebook; Twitter; política; societat; mitjans de comunicació; fake news; censura; llibertat d¿expressióRSC; redes sociales; Facebook; Twitter; política; sociedad; medios de comunicación; fake news; censura; libertat d¿expressió
CSR; social media; Facebook; Twitter; politics; society; mass media; fake news; censorship; freedom of speach
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10609/72048Abstract
Amb milions d¿usuaris actius arreu del món,
 superant limitacions geogràfiques i culturals, les xarxes socials
 de participació oberta han evolucionat de ser una plataforma
 d¿intercanvi de vivències i informació personal entre coneguts,
 a convertir-se en una alternativa als mitjans d¿informació
 tradicionals, públics i privats. En un món actual altament
 interconnectat, els continguts publicats en aquestes xarxes
 socials tenen una gran influència sobre la societat, i els
 governs tracten de legislar quins són admissibles i quins no.
 Les xarxes socials es troben involucrades en una lluita entre la
 garantia d¿oferir els drets d¿expressió i llibertat als seus
 usuaris amb la seva responsabilitat social davant de quins
 continguts accepten mostrar sota el seu nom. Més enllà de la
 prohibició de mostrar continguts contraris a la legislació
 vigent (que també ocasiona dilemes ètics en països que limiten
 la llibertat d¿expressió o els drets humans) han de regular
 voluntàriament quin tipus de control propi imposar als seus
 continguts, sense afectar a la llibertat legítima dels seus
 usuaris. Aquest article analitza les diferències i similituds
 entre les xarxes socials de participació oberta i els mitjans de
 comunicació tradicionals en el rol de difusors d¿informació,
 estudia els problemes que poden aparèixer i proposa vies de
 solució responsables alhora que respectuoses amb la llibertat
 dels usuaris.With millions of active users around the
 world, overcoming geographical and cultural restrictions, open
 participation social networks have evolved from being a
 platform for the exchange of experiences and personal
 information between acquaintances, to become an alternative
 to the traditional mass media, both public and private. In the
 highly interconnected world where we live, the contents
 published in these social networks have a great influence on
 society, and governments are trying to legislate which ones are
 acceptable and which ones are not. Social networks are
 involved in a fight between the guarantee of offering the right
 to freedom of speech to their users with their social
 responsibility in front of what content they accept to show
 under their name. Beyond the prohibition to show content
 contrary to current legislation (which also causes ethical
 dilemmas in countries where freedom of speech or human
 rights are restricted), they must also voluntarily regulate what
 type of self-control to impose on their contents, without
 affecting the legitimate freedom of their users. This article
 analyses the differences and similarities between open social
 networks and traditional mass media in the role of information
 distributors, studies the problems that may arise, and propose
 responsive ways of action while respectful with the freedom of
 users.
Con millones de usuarios activos en todo el mundo, superando limitaciones geográficas y culturales, las redes sociales de participación abierta han evolucionado de ser una plataforma de intercambio de experiencias e información personal entre conocidos, para convertirse en una alternativa a los medios de comunicación tradicionales, tanto públicos como privados. En un mundo actual altamente interconectado, los contenidos publicados en estas redes sociales tienen gran influencia sobre la sociedad, y los gobiernos tratan de legislar cuáles son admisibles y cuáles no. Las redes sociales se encuentran envueltas en una lucha entre la garantia de ofrecer el derecho de expresión y libertad a sus usuarios con su responsabilidad social frente a que contenidos aceptan mostrar bajo su nombre. Más allá de la prohibición de mostrar contenidos prohibidos por la legislación vigente (lo que también puede ocasionar dilemas éticos en países que limitan la libertad de expresión o los derechos humanos) tienen que regular voluntariamente qué tipo de control propio imponer a sus contenidos, sin afectar a la libertad legítima de sus usuarios. Este artículo analiza las diferencias y similitudes entre las redes sociales de participación abierta y los medios de comunicación tradicionales en el rol de distribuidores de información, estudia los problemas que pueden aparecer y propone vías de solución responsables a la vez que respetuosas con la libertad de los usuarios.
Date
2018-01-19Type
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisIdentifier
oai:openaccess.uoc.edu:10609/72048http://hdl.handle.net/10609/72048
Copyright/License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/Collections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Social Protection in Low Income Countries and Fragile Situations : Challenges and Future DirectionsOvadiya, Mirey; Zampaglione, Giuseppe; Das, Maitreyi; Andrews, Colin; Elder, John (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2013-05-28)Demand for social protection is growing in low income countries and fragile situations. In recent years, the success of social protection (SP) interventions in middle income countries (MICs) like Brazil and Mexico, along with the series of food, fuel, and financial crises, has prompted policymakers in low income countries (LICs) and fragile situations (FSs) to examine the possibility of introducing such programs in their own countries. Flagship programs in countries as diverse as Ethiopia, India, Pakistan, and Rwanda have shown the adaptability of social protection interventions to the LIC context. Yet, despite growing levels of support for these initiatives, many challenges remain. In LICs and FSs, governments are confronted with a nexus of mutually reinforcing deficits that increase the need for SP programs and simultaneously reduce their ability to successfully respond. Governments face hard choices about the type, affordability, and sustainability of SP interventions. The paper reviews how these factors affect SP programs in these countries and identifies ways to address the deficits. It supports the establishment of resilient SP systems to address specific needs and vulnerabilities and to respond flexibly to both slow and sudden onset crises. To achieve this, both innovation and pragmatism are required in three strategic areas: (i) building the basic blocks of SP systems (e.g., targeting, payments, and monitoring and evaluation); (ii) ensuring financial sustainability; and (iii) promoting good governance and transparency. These issues suggest the possibility of a different trajectory in the development of social protection in LICs than in MICs. The implications for World Bank support include the need to focus on increasing knowledge and operational effectiveness of SP programs, fostering institutional links between multiple SP programs, and using community capacity and technological innovations to overcome bottlenecks in operations.
-
Managing Risk, Promoting GrowthWorld Bank (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2016-02-08)A growing body of evidence demonstrates
 that individuals and households experience a range of
 positive outcomes from social protection. Social protection
 increases productivity and growth. Countries can realize
 significant benefits by creating an integrated social
 protection system. Social protection is affordable in
 low-income countries despite tight budgets. While overall
 spending on social protection in Africa remains low by
 international standards, experience suggests that social
 protection programs can achieve national coverage at the
 cost of only 1 to 2 percent of gross domestic product (GDP).
 While this is only a portion of the financing required to
 operate a social protection system, it draws attention to
 what countries can achieve in the short-term. Indeed, one
 way in which existing social protection spending can be made
 significantly more efficient would be by reallocating
 existing financing for inefficient subsidies and ad hoc
 emergency food aid to predictable safety nets. At the same
 time, pursuing reforms to social security systems will
 ensure their fiscal sustainability, while expanding
 coverage. Notably, the costs of not protecting poor families
 are very high, are borne disproportionately by women and
 children, and undermine the productivity of future
 generations. The Strategy will be implemented by leveraging
 partnerships, knowledge, and the World Bank's financing
 instruments. The World Bank will continue to invest in
 analytical work to fill knowledge gaps and promote an
 evidence-based dialogue for social protection systems in
 Africa and further innovation. It will work with governments
 to build country-owned national social protection systems
 with the aim of reducing fragmentation in the sector. The
 Bank also will pay particular attention to institutional
 development and capacity building by using its lending to
 increase the coverage of successful social protection
 interventions. Throughout this work, the Bank will work in
 coordination with governments, development partners, the
 private sector, academics, civil society, and beneficiaries.
-
ISSPThe International Social Survey Programme (ISSP) is a continuing annual programme of cross-national collaboration on surveys covering topics important for social science research. It brings together pre-existing national social science projects and co-ordinates research goals, thereby adding a cross-national, cross-cultural perspective to the individual, national studies. Formed in 1983, the group develops topical modules dealing with important areas of social science as supplements to regular national surveys. Every survey includes questions about general attitudes toward various social issues such as the legal system, sex, and the economy. Special topics have included the environment, the role of government, social inequality, social support, family and gender issues, work orientation, the impact of religious background, behaviour, and beliefs on social and political preferences, and national identity. Participating countries vary for each topical module. The merging of the data into a cross-national dataset is performed by the Zentralarchiv fuer Empirische Sozialforschung, University of Cologne. A compact disc (CD-ROM) (archived under SN 3479) containing data and documentation for ISSP surveys carried out 1985-1996, 1998, 2000 and 2002 is available from the UKDA. Main Topics:The CD-ROM contains the complete collection of data and documentation of the International Social Survey Programme (ISSP) between 1985 and 1996, 1998, 2000. In these years, the ISSP conducted twelve different Social Science Surveys in up to 30 countries. The collection comprises the following titles: 1985 - Role of Government I (6 countries) (ZA 1490,UKDA 2448) 1986 - Social Networks and Support Systems (7 countries) (ZA 1620, UKDA 2560) 1987 - Social Inequality I (10 countries) (ZA 1680,UKDA 2702) 1988 - Family and Changing Sex Roles I (8 countries) (ZA 1700, UKDA 2744) 1989 - Work Orientations I (10 countries) (ZA 1840, UKDA 2864) 1990 - Role of Government II (9 countries) (ZA 1950, UKDA 2956) 1991 - Religion (16 countries) (ZA 2150, UKDA 3062) 1992 - Social Inequality II (17 countries) (ZA 2310, UKDA 3498) 1993 - Environment (20 countries) (ZA 2450, UKDA 3473) 1994 - Family and Changing Gender Roles II (22 countries) (ZA 2620, UKDA 3584) 1995 - National Identity (22 countries) (ZA 2880, UKDA 3809) 1996 - Role of Government III (23 countries) (ZA 2900, UKDA 4480) 1998 - Religion 11 (30 countries) (ZA 3190, UKDA 4482) 2000 - Environment 2000 (34 countries) (ZA 3440, UKDA 4827) 2002 - Family and Changing Gender Roles III (34 countries) (ZA 3880, UKDA 5018) Additionally, the 1985 and 1990 surveys, Role of the Government I and II, have been cumulated for those countries and those variables which have been included in both surveys: 1985/1990 - Role of the Government I/II (5 countries) (ZA 2240, UKDA 3499). All of the above are also available as separate datasets. The data for 1997, 1999 and 2001 are available separately on dedicated CD ROMs.