• English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • English 
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Journals AtoZ
  • McGill Journal of Education
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Journals AtoZ
  • McGill Journal of Education
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All of the LibraryCommunitiesPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsThis CollectionPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsProfilesView

My Account

Login

The Library

AboutNew SubmissionSubmission GuideSearch GuideRepository PolicyContact

Statistics

Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

STRATEGIC AND MORAL QUESTIONS IN THE NUCLEAR DEBATE

  • CSV
  • RefMan
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • RefWorks
Author(s)
Hehir, Brian

Full record
Show full item record
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/1999
Online Access
http://mje.mcgill.ca/article/view/7761
Abstract
The strategy of deterrence as a military option is in trouble today. The left has always been against the policy of nuclear weapons being stockpiled and strategically arranged to create a deterrent because of possible use either accidently or by design. The right said that nuclear weapons could play some role as a military option. But with the advent of the Strategic Defence Initiative even the right sees the deterrence argument as bankrupt. For the first time, this puts the western world in a position of striking out and reshaping the debate in a way that will make it productive in terms of security, defence, economy, and safety. RÉSUMÉ La stratégie de la dissuasion est une option militaire aujourd'hui en danger. La gauche s'est toujours opposée à la constitution d'un arsenal nucléaire que l'on déploie en certains endroits stratégiques comme moyen de dissuasion, en raison des risques éventuels d'une utilisation accidentelle ou délibérée. La droite pour sa part a toujours déclaré que les armements nucléaires pouvaient jouer un rôle comme option militaire. Mais depuis l'avènement de l'initiative de défense stratégique (SDI), l'argument de dissuasion apparaît périmé, même pour la droite. Pour la première fois, le monde occidental est en mesure de refaçonner le débat de manière à le rendre productif en fonction de la sécurité, de la défense, de l'économie et de la sûreté.
Date
1987-09-01
Type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Identifier
oai:ojs.ejournal.library.mcgill.ca:article/7761
http://mje.mcgill.ca/article/view/7761
Collections
McGill Journal of Education

entitlement

 
DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
Quick Guide | Contact Us
Open Repository is a service operated by 
Atmire NV
 

Export search results

The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.