Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Carotid ultrasound is not helpful in simple syncopeThe use of carotid ultrasound is often ordered in patients with simple syncope, as part of a standard work-up. We reviewed the evidence behind this practice and discovered flaws in clinician reasoning as well as circular reasoning in the design of research studies that address this issue.
-
Protected carotid artery stenting (PCAS): a short medical technology assessmentAfter a period of experimenting with angioplasty and stenting, carotid artery stenting under embolic protection (PCAS) is becoming a viable alternative for carotid endarterectomy (CEA). A standard literature review showed that, at January 2005, there was no evidence that PCAS is more effective than CEA. The high costs of stent and protection device makes PCAS then inferior to CEA. PCAS may be the sole possible option in patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis unfit for surgery, where the high risk of stroke overrides uncertainty about health effects and overrides cost-effectiveness. These are a few patients per year in Belgium. Several randomised controlled trials comparing PCAS and CEA are now recruiting patients. To have answers on key questions of cost-effectiveness, it is of paramount importance that these trials recruit and publish rapidly. The KCE (Belgian HealthCare Knowledge Center/Centre Fédéral d'Expertise des Soins de Santé/Federaal Kenniscentrum voor de Gezondheidszorg) therefore advises cooperation with these trials. Outside these trials and compassionate use in the few symptomatic patients unfit for CEA, the use of PCAS raises serious ethical questions.
-
The appropriate use of carotid endarterectomy"FOR THE FIRST 30 YEARS AFTER CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMY WAS FIRST DEVELOPED, anecdotal evidence was used to identify patients with internal carotid artery disease for whom this procedure would be appropriate. More recently, the appropriateness of carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic patients and asymptomatic subjects has emerged from 7 randomized trials. Risk of stroke and benefit from the procedure are greatest for symptomatic patients with at least 70% stenosis of the internal carotid artery. Within this group, carotid endarterectomy is most beneficial for the following patients: otherwise healthy elderly patients, those with hemispheric transient ischemic attack, those with tandem extracranial and intracranial lesions and those without evidence of collateral vessels. Risk of perioperative stroke and death is higher in the following groups, although they still benefit: patients with widespread leukoaraiosis, those with occlusion of the contralateral internal carotid artery and those with intraluminal thrombus. Patients with 50% to 69% stenosis experience lesser benefit, and some other groups may even be harmed by carotid endarterectomy, including women and patients with transient monocular blindness only. The procedure is indicated for patients presenting with lacunar stroke and for those with a nearly occluded internal carotid artery, but the benefit is muted. Patients with less than 50% stenosis do not benefit. In the largest randomized trial of asymptomatic subjects, the perioperative risk of stroke and death was very low (1.5%), but the results indicated that a prohibitively high number of subjects (83) must be treated to prevent one stroke in 2 years. The subsequent literature reported higher perioperative risks (2.8% to 5.6%). In asymptomatic individuals nearly half of the strokes that occur may be due to heart and small-vessel disease. These limitations counter any potential benefit. Another trial is in progress and may identify subgroups of asymptomatic subjects who would benefit. Meanwhile, most individuals without symptoms fare better with medical care."