Difference of a Different Kind : Jewish Constructions of Race During the Long Eighteenth Century /
Religion, Jewish Studies, Theology.
Theology, Jewish Studies and Religious Studies.
Full recordShow full item record
AbstractThe eighteenth century has long been considered a formative period in the history of European racial identity. Difference of a Different Kind offers a new exploration of the ways Jewish authors confronted notions of race that began to pervade European ideology and adapted them to construct their own identity.
The eighteenth century has long been considered a formative period in the history of European racial identity. Difference of a Different Kind offers a new exploration of the ways Jewish authors confronted notions of race that began to pervade European ideology and adapted them to construct their own identity.
Electronic reproduction. ,
Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
Iris Idelson-Shein is Alexander von Humboldt Research Fellow at the Martin Buber Professur fur Judische Religionsphilosophie, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main.
Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher’s Web site, viewed March 24, 2015)
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Different students, different needs, different times: A retheorisation of tertiary transitionChris Rust; Burke, Maureen; Ahmed, S.; McKenzie, Malcolm (Oxford Centre for Staff & Learning Development, 2004-01-01)
What differences can performance ratings make? Difference-in-difference estimates of impact on local government responsiveness in the PhilippinesCapuno, Joseph J.; Garcia, Maria Melody S. (School of Economics, Univ. of the Philippines Quezon, 2009)In many countries that have decentralized, improving the accountability of local officials is increasingly emphasized to make them more responsive to their constituents' needs. This paper provides evidence that the public announcement of performance ratings can induce local governments to become responsive. The evidence is based on application of a difference-in-difference method on a unique household-level dataset collected during the three-year pilot test of a rating system in 12 municipalities and cities in the Philippines. The results are consistent with the predictions of political agency models of incumbent behavior. Some policy guidelines on the design and implementation performance benchmarks are made.
Online Format vs. Live Mode of Instruction: Do Human Capital Differences or Differences in Returns to Human Capital Explain the Differences in Outcomes?Oskar R. Harmon; James LambrinosOur paper asks the question: Does mode of instruction format (live or online format) effect test scores in the principles of macroeconomics classes? Our data are from several sections of principles of macroeconomics, some in live format, some in online format, and all taught by the same instructor. We find that test scores for the online format, when corrected for sample selection bias, are four points higher than for the live format, and the difference is statistically significant. One possible explanation for this is that there was slightly higher human capital in the classes that had the online format. A Oaxaca decomposition of this difference in grades was conducted to see how much was due to human capital and how much was due to the differences in the rates of return to human capital. This analysis reveals that 25% of the difference was due to the higher human capital with the remaining 75% due to differences in the returns to human capital. It is possible that for the relatively older student with the appropriate online learning skill set, and with schedule constrains created by family and job, the online format provides them with a more productive learning environment than does the alternative traditional live class format. Also, because our data are limited to the student s academic transcript, we recommend future research include data on learning style characteristics, and the constraints formed by family and job choices.