• English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • English 
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Globethics User Collection
  • Globethics Library Submissions
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Globethics User Collection
  • Globethics Library Submissions
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All of the LibraryCommunitiesPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsThis CollectionPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsProfilesView

My Account

Login

The Library

AboutSearch GuideContact

Statistics

Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

Bioética: un puente entre pensamiento y doctrina [Bioethics: a link between thought and doctrine]

  • CSV
  • RefMan
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • RefWorks
Thumbnail
Name:
n64_bioetica_un_puente.pdf
Size:
1.545Mb
Format:
PDF
Download
Author(s)
Kottow, Miguel
Keywords
Bioethics
Protection
Anthropology
doctrine
GE Subjects
Cultural ethics
Bioethics
Social ethics
Sexual orientation/gender
Medical ethics
Health ethics

Full record
Show full item record
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/214349
Abstract
"La bioética contemporánea se ha vuelto academicista y disputante, sumergida en debates que carecen de aplicación práctica, difi cultando la orientación del quehacer médico en su diversas facetas: asistencial, científi ca, de salud pública, ecológica. La brecha entre posturas fundamentalmente seculares, plurales, religiosas o estrictamente racionales no permite llegar a compromisos y acuerdos, sobre todo frente a los grandes temas de los extremos de la vida, de la proporcionalidad de intervenciones médicas, y de las investigaciones que a nivel de la biología molecular, que erosionan los conceptos de salud y enfermedad, asó como la distinción entre esfuerzos terapéuticos y medicina desiderativa. Desde la bioética urge encontrar un tronco antropológico común que permita la convivencia de perspectivas diversas pero no discordantes. Este artículo propone entender como rasgos esenciales de todo ser humano su necesidad de relación con el otro y con el mundo, y su anhelo de elaborar un proyecto de vida que trascienda su existencia biológica. Ello requiere el reconocimiento moral del prójimo según elaborado por Honneth en base al pensamiento de Hegel, y el compromiso de protección y cuidado a los desaventajados y desempoderados. La bioética ha de reconocer y evaluar las situaciones y los procesos mórbidos en que la relacionalidad y la trascendencia se han perdido, y ponderar la razonabilidad de los esfuerzos médicos para resolver estas pérdidas y la futilidad estos esfuerzos cuando la vida biológica es vaciada de su sentido existencial" ["Bioethics has become excessively steeped in academicism, failing to serve as an applied ethics capable of orienting medical practice in its diverse areas: clinical, scientifi c, public and ecological. There is a deep schism between secular, plural, religious convictions and strict rationality that hinders reaching consensus or agreements mainly when facing issues like the extremes of life, the proportionality of medical intervention, the research at molecular level, all of which have eroded the distinction between health and disease, as well as therapy and enhancement. Bioethics is called upon to assist fi nding a common anthropological ground that might help a fruitful coexistence of a variety of different but not discordant views. This paper seeks to understand as essential attributes of human beings their need to relate with others and with the world, and the quest for transcendence beyond the fi nitude of biological existence. This will require the moral recognition of every individual as presented by Honneth in his elaborations based on Hegel’s thought, and the commitment to protect and care for the disadvantaged and disempowered. Bioethics has to recognize and evaluate disease’s situations and processes in which relationality and signifi cance have been lost, and weigh the reasonableness of medical efforts to solve these losses, as well as the futility of these efforts when biological life is emptied of its existential meaning"]
Date
2013
Type
Article
Copyright/License
Creative Commons Copyright (CC 2.5)
Collections
Globethics Library Submissions

entitlement

 
DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2025)  DuraSpace
Quick Guide | Contact Us
Open Repository is a service operated by 
Atmire NV
 

Export search results

The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.