• English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • 中文 
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • 登入
查看項目 
  •   首頁
  • Globethics User Collection
  • Globethics Library Submissions
  • 查看項目
  •   首頁
  • Globethics User Collection
  • Globethics Library Submissions
  • 查看項目
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

瀏覽

所有文獻群體出版日期標題主題作者此合集出版日期標題主題作者個人檔案檢視

我的帳號

登入

The Library

AboutSearch GuideContact

Statistics

Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

Informed consent in Sri Lanka

  • CSV
  • RefMan
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • RefWorks
Thumbnail
名字:
n58-informed.pdf
檔案大小:
246.5Kb
格式:
PDF
下載
Author(s)
Sumathipala, Athula
Siribaddana, Sisira
Hewage, Suwin
Lekamwattage, Manura
Keywords
Informed consent
Ethics
information leaflets
Sri Lanka
GE Subjects
Methods of ethics
Bioethics
Medical ethics
Community ethics

所有記錄
顯示完整的項目記錄
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/226140
Abstract
"Background Approval of the research proposal by an ethical review committee from both sponsoring and host countries is a generally agreed requirement in externally sponsored research. However, capacity for ethics review is not universal. Aim of this study was to identify opinions and views of the members serving in ethical review and ethics committees in Sri Lanka on informed consent, essential components in the information leaflet and the consent form. Methods We obtained ethical approval from UK and Sri Lanka. A series of consensus generation meetings on the protocol were conducted. A task oriented interview guide was developed. The interview was based on open-ended questionnaire. Then the participants were given a WHO checklist on informed consent and requested to rate the items on a three point scale ranging from extremely important to not important. Results Twenty-nine members from ethics committees participated. Majority of participants (23), believed a copy of the information leaflet and consent form, should accompany research proposal. Opinions about the items that should be included in the information leaflets varied. Participants identified 18 criteria as requirements in the information leaflet and 19 for the consent form. The majority, 20 (69%), believed that all research need ethical approval but identified limited human resource, time and inadequate capacity as constraints. Fifteen (52%) believed that written consent is not required for all research. Verbal consent emerged as an alternative to written consent. The majority of participants rated all components of the WHO checklist as important. Conclusion The number of themes generated for the consent form (N = 18) is as many as for the information leaflet (N = 19) and had several overlaps. This suggests that the consent form should be itemized to reflect the contents covered in the information leaflet. The participants' opinion on components of the information leaflets and consent forms proved to be similar with WHO checklist on informed consent"
Date
2008
Type
Article
Copyright/License
Creative Commons Copyright (CC 2.5)
合集
Globethics Library Submissions

entitlement

 
DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2025)  DuraSpace
快速指南 | 聯絡我們
Open Repository is a service operated by 
Atmire NV
 

導出搜尋結果

導出選項允許您將輸入的查詢所產生的搜尋結果導出到一個檔案中。有不同的格式可以選擇下載。要導出項目,請點擊與最佳下載格式相對應的按鈕。

預設情況下,點擊導出按鈕會導致進行系統允許下,下載最大數量的項目。

要選擇搜索結果的子集,請點擊「選擇性導出」按鈕,然後選擇要導出的項目。每次可以導出的項目數量與完全導出受到同樣的限制。

"

作出選擇後,點擊其中一個導出格式按鈕。導出格式旁邊的氣泡中會顯示即將導出的項目數量。

"