Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSumathipala, Athula
dc.contributor.authorSiribaddana, Sisira
dc.contributor.authorHewage, Suwin
dc.contributor.authorLekamwattage, Manura
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-25T10:19:29Z
dc.date.available2019-09-25T10:19:29Z
dc.date.created2015-08-24 03:19
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier.issn1472-6939
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/226140
dc.description.abstract"Background Approval of the research proposal by an ethical review committee from both sponsoring and host countries is a generally agreed requirement in externally sponsored research. However, capacity for ethics review is not universal. Aim of this study was to identify opinions and views of the members serving in ethical review and ethics committees in Sri Lanka on informed consent, essential components in the information leaflet and the consent form. Methods We obtained ethical approval from UK and Sri Lanka. A series of consensus generation meetings on the protocol were conducted. A task oriented interview guide was developed. The interview was based on open-ended questionnaire. Then the participants were given a WHO checklist on informed consent and requested to rate the items on a three point scale ranging from extremely important to not important. Results Twenty-nine members from ethics committees participated. Majority of participants (23), believed a copy of the information leaflet and consent form, should accompany research proposal. Opinions about the items that should be included in the information leaflets varied. Participants identified 18 criteria as requirements in the information leaflet and 19 for the consent form. The majority, 20 (69%), believed that all research need ethical approval but identified limited human resource, time and inadequate capacity as constraints. Fifteen (52%) believed that written consent is not required for all research. Verbal consent emerged as an alternative to written consent. The majority of participants rated all components of the WHO checklist as important. Conclusion The number of themes generated for the consent form (N = 18) is as many as for the information leaflet (N = 19) and had several overlaps. This suggests that the consent form should be itemized to reflect the contents covered in the information leaflet. The participants' opinion on components of the information leaflets and consent forms proved to be similar with WHO checklist on informed consent"
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherBioMed Central
dc.rightsCreative Commons Copyright (CC 2.5)
dc.subjectInformed consent
dc.subjectEthics
dc.subjectinformation leaflets
dc.subjectSri Lanka
dc.subject.otherMethods of ethics
dc.subject.otherBioethics
dc.subject.otherMedical ethics
dc.subject.otherCommunity ethics
dc.titleInformed consent in Sri Lanka
dc.typeArticle
dc.source.journaltitleBMC Medical Ethics
dc.source.volume9
dc.source.beginpage7
dcterms.accessRightsopen access
refterms.dateFOA2019-09-25T10:19:29Z
ge.collectioncodeAA
ge.dataimportlabelGlobethics object
ge.identifier.legacyglobethics:6170887
ge.identifier.permalinkhttps://www.globethics.net/gel/6170887
ge.journalyear2008
ge.lastmodificationdate2019-02-11 16:14
ge.lastmodificationuseradmin@novalogix.ch
ge.submissions1
ge.peerreviewedyes
ge.setnameGlobeEthicsLib
ge.setspecglobeethicslib
ge.submitter.emailjsmartinezg2@gmail.com
ge.submitter.nameMartinez, Jhon
ge.submitter.userid13344334
ge.subtitleA survey among ethics committee members


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
n58-informed.pdf
Size:
246.5Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record