• English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • English 
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Education and Research Ethics
  • Research Ethics
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Education and Research Ethics
  • Research Ethics
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All of the LibraryCommunitiesPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsThis CollectionPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsProfilesView

My Account

Login

The Library

AboutSearch GuideContact

Statistics

Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

The experience of the research ethics committee at a public university in the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil

  • CSV
  • RefMan
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • RefWorks
Thumbnail
Name:
n18eng.pdf
Size:
459.2Kb
Format:
PDF
Download
Author(s)
Alves Paiva, Patrícia
Keywords
Ethics
Research
Research ethics committees
GE Subjects
Bioethics
Medical ethics
Health ethics
Community ethics

Full record
Show full item record
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/236251
Abstract
"The article reports the experience of the Research Ethics Committee at the State University of Montes Claros, MG, Brazil, in the period from 2000 to 2009. Desk research, case study method were employd, and the significance level was set at p < 0.05. Of 1,751 projects, 95.8% were approved. Problems in preparing the statement of informed consent were among reasons for disapproval. The health sciences area of knowledge stood out at 60.8%. The average time between submission and ethical review was 11 days. The area of knowledge influenced the average time between submission and ethical assessment (p < 0.05), but did not affect the time to approval of the research project. Conclusion: the local committee followed the standards for ethical assessment in accordance with Resolution 466/2012, in view of the fact that it rejected projects with shortcomings in the statement of informed consent, thus protecting the subjects of the research."
Date
2015
Type
Article
Copyright/License
Creative Commons Copyright (CC 2.5)
Collections
Research Ethics

entitlement

 
DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2025)  DuraSpace
Quick Guide | Contact Us
Open Repository is a service operated by 
Atmire NV
 

Export search results

The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.