• English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • English 
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Globethics User Collection
  • Globethics Library Submissions
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Globethics User Collection
  • Globethics Library Submissions
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All of the LibraryCommunitiesPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsThis CollectionPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsProfilesView

My Account

Login

The Library

AboutSearch GuideContact

Statistics

Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

Sanitary surveillance: recollection of medications in Brazilian legislation

  • CSV
  • RefMan
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • RefWorks
Thumbnail
Name:
n8eng.pdf
Size:
93.38Kb
Format:
PDF
Download
Author(s)
Macedo, Isabel
Reis, Simone
Garrafa, Volnei
Keywords
Bioethics
Drug and narcotic control
Health surveillance
Social vulnerability
Beneficence
Liability legal
Social responsibility
GE Subjects
Bioethics
Medical ethics
Health ethics
Community ethics

Full record
Show full item record
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/237087
Abstract
"The article derives from exploratory and transversal research that gathered data on recollection of medications, action foreseen in the Brazilian sanitary legislation that must be adopted by enterprises in cases of registration cancelling or deviation on the quality of products. The study was conducted between March and October 2005, and this article describes its outcomes from four key-cases, which provided elements for discussion by highlighting the kind of procedure adopted in each. Data show that out of 57 recollection cases started in the period, 22 took place voluntarily (38.6%), six due to registration cancelling (10.5%), and 29 by Anvisa’s determination (50.9%). Those 35 featured as non-voluntary (29+6 cases) represented 61.4% of total, regarding which the State was forced to intervene. The discussion uses the principle of beneficence, ethics of protection, responsibility, and the bioethics of intervention. It concludes by indicating that, although there is regulation for voluntary recollection of Revista Bioética 2010; 18(3): 623 – 35 634 medications, this procedure requires responsible intervention by the regulatory agency, aiming at higher good: to benefit and to protect people. It considers that State intervention is ethical in these cases. "
Date
2010
Type
Article
Copyright/License
Creative Commons Copyright (CC 2.5)
Collections
Globethics Library Submissions

entitlement

 
DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2025)  DuraSpace
Quick Guide | Contact Us
Open Repository is a service operated by 
Atmire NV
 

Export search results

The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.