Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTheobald, Dave
dc.contributor.authorCulver, Nada
dc.contributor.authorBirdsong, Brett
dc.contributor.authorLeshy, John D.
dc.contributor.authorLance, Linda
dc.contributor.authorDombeck, Mike
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-25T10:41:59Z
dc.date.available2019-09-25T10:41:59Z
dc.date.created2017-08-19 00:49
dc.date.issued2016-10-21
dc.identifieroai:scholar.law.colorado.edu:flpma-turns-40-1006
dc.identifierhttp://scholar.law.colorado.edu/flpma-turns-40/6
dc.identifierhttps://youtu.be/I_lvtBSF9FE
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/239374
dc.description.abstractVIDEO: 2:50 p.m. - 4:10 p.m. SESSION 4: Modern Challenges and Modern Solutions Moderator and Commentator: Mark Squillace, University of Colorado School of Law Panelists: Dave Theobald, Conservation Science Partners Nada Culver, The Wilderness Society Bret Birdsong, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, School of Law 4:10 p.m. - 5:10 p.m. SESSION 5: The Future of our Public Lands Panelists: John D. Leshy, University of California, Hastings College of the Law Linda Lance, Bureau of Land Management (Invited) Mike Dombeck, University of Wisconsin, Stevens Point
dc.publisherColorado Law Scholarly Commons
dc.sourceFLPMA Turns 40 (October 21)
dc.subjectlandscape level
dc.subjectlandscape scale
dc.subjectlandscape perspective
dc.subjectlandscape ecologist
dc.subjectconservation planning
dc.subjectland use change
dc.subjectland-use change
dc.subjectlocal
dc.subjectWest-wide
dc.subjectnational scale projection models
dc.subjectfederal agencies
dc.subjectNASA
dc.subjecteight-year project
dc.subjectland managers
dc.subjectNational Park Service
dc.subjectNPS
dc.subjectland use planning
dc.subjectland-use planning
dc.subjectcounty land use planning efforts
dc.subjectdata
dc.subjectinformation
dc.subjectinforming the dialogue
dc.subjectscientists
dc.subjectdecision-making scales
dc.subjectbest science
dc.subjectecological scales
dc.subjecttime
dc.subjectday
dc.subjectmonth
dc.subjectyear
dc.subjectdecade
dc.subjectcentury
dc.subjectmillennia
dc.subjectspace
dc.subjectlocal
dc.subjectecoregion
dc.subjectcontinental
dc.subjectglobal
dc.subjectnesting
dc.subjectforaging
dc.subjectseasonal migration
dc.subjecthabitat specialists
dc.subjectneotropical migration
dc.subjectpest/pathogen outbreaks
dc.subjectwildfire regime
dc.subjectspeciation
dc.subjectecology
dc.subjectsmall spatial scales
dc.subjectrapid time frames
dc.subjectbroader spatial scales
dc.subjectlonger time frames
dc.subjectsage- grouse
dc.subjectdynamic ecological patterns
dc.subjectecological processes
dc.subjectBLM
dc.subjectBureau of Land Management
dc.subjectRMP
dc.subjectRisk Management Plan
dc.subjectprotected areas
dc.subjectYellowstone National Park
dc.subjectecological flows
dc.subjectNo Park is an Island
dc.subjectbroader ecoregional scales
dc.subjectlandscape principles
dc.subjectstructure
dc.subjectlandscape pattern
dc.subjectphysiognomy
dc.subjecthabitat structure
dc.subjectpopulation structure
dc.subjectgenetic structure
dc.subjectcomposition
dc.subjectlandscape types
dc.subjectcommunities
dc.subjectecosystems
dc.subjectspecies populations
dc.subjectgenes
dc.subjectfunction
dc.subjectlandscape processes
dc.subjectdisturbances
dc.subjectland-use trends
dc.subjectinterspecific interactions
dc.subjectecosystem processes
dc.subjectdemographic processes
dc.subjectlife histories
dc.subjectgenetic processes
dc.subjectcornerstones
dc.subjectReed Noss
dc.subjectinterplay
dc.subjectplants
dc.subjectanimals
dc.subjecthierarchical nesting scale
dc.subjectappropriate scale
dc.subjectnatural scale
dc.subjectproblem
dc.subjectcontext
dc.subjecthigher scales
dc.subjectlower scales
dc.subjectmultiple scales
dc.subjectbroad perspective
dc.subjectintermediate scale
dc.subjectlower perspective
dc.subjecthuman landscapes
dc.subjectsite project level
dc.subjectGreat Northern Landscape Conservation Cooperative
dc.subjectGNLCC
dc.subjectGreat Northern LCC
dc.subjectGreater Yellowstone Coordinating Committee
dc.subjectWyoming Landscape Conservation Initiative
dc.subjectArid Lands Initiative
dc.subjectKootenay Conservation Program
dc.subjectBlackfoot Challenge
dc.subjectRocky Mountain Front
dc.subjectBig Hole Conservation Alliance
dc.subjectCrown of the Continent
dc.subjectInteragency Grizzly Bear Committee
dc.subjectWashington Connected Landscapes
dc.subjectColumbia Basin Federal Caucus
dc.subjectIntermountain West JV
dc.subjectIntermountain West Joint Venture
dc.subjectYellowstone to Yukon
dc.subjectCAN Wildlife Directors Council
dc.subjectcomplexity
dc.subjectNGOs
dc.subjectnon-governmental organizations
dc.subjectcommunity groups
dc.subjectparticular place
dc.subjectnatural coalitions
dc.subjectlandscape planning perspective
dc.subjectThe Nature Conservancy
dc.subjectTNC ecoregions
dc.subjectdivisions
dc.subjectlower 48
dc.subjectUnited States
dc.subjectdistributions of animals and plants
dc.subjectbiodiversity
dc.subjectplanning boundaries
dc.subjectlearning
dc.subjectcommonality
dc.subjectSouthern Rockies Ecosystem Project
dc.subjecthuman side
dc.subjectLandscape Conservation Cooperatives
dc.subjectLCC
dc.subjectdisparate activities
dc.subjectWestern Governors Association
dc.subjectcrucial habitat assessment tool
dc.subjectsynthetic dataset
dc.subjectstate boundaries
dc.subjectcomprehensive dataset
dc.subjectGIS data
dc.subjectGeographic Information Systems data
dc.subjectlow sensing data
dc.subjectedge matching issues
dc.subjectmonitoring
dc.subjectadaptive management
dc.subjectBLM Rapid Ecological Assessments
dc.subjectREAs
dc.subjectREA teams
dc.subjectdifferent methods
dc.subjectdifferent datasets
dc.subjectdifferent time frames
dc.subjectdifferent management questions
dc.subjectstitch together
dc.subjectGreen River Basin
dc.subjectLandscape Conservation Design
dc.subjectLCD
dc.subjectstakeholders
dc.subjectWyoming Basin
dc.subjectColorado Plateau
dc.subjectstudy area
dc.subjectchallenges
dc.subjectopportunities
dc.subjectlandscape integrity
dc.subjecttransboundary connectivity
dc.subjectmonitoring across landscapes
dc.subjectPlanning 2.0
dc.subjectconservations targets
dc.subjectecological processes
dc.subjectecosystems
dc.subjecthabitats
dc.subjectspecies
dc.subjecthuman modification
dc.subjecthydrologic regimes
dc.subjectlandscape scale disturbances
dc.subjectterrestrial connectivity
dc.subjectaquatic connectivity
dc.subjectnatural fire regimes
dc.subjectinsects
dc.subjectforest pathogens
dc.subjectriparian corridors
dc.subjectriverine
dc.subjectwetlands
dc.subjectalpine lakes
dc.subjectuplands
dc.subjectpothole lakes
dc.subjectalpine
dc.subjectsubalpine
dc.subjectwoodland
dc.subjectdry forests
dc.subjectsage shrub
dc.subjectgrasslands
dc.subjectwhitebark pine
dc.subjectsalmon
dc.subjectsteelhead
dc.subjectcutthroat trout
dc.subjectbull trout
dc.subjecttrumpeter swan
dc.subjectburrowing owl
dc.subjectwhite-headed woodpecker
dc.subjectLewis’s woodpecker
dc.subjectpygmy rabbit
dc.subjectpronghorn antelope
dc.subjectgrizzly bear
dc.subjectCanada lynx
dc.subjectwolverine
dc.subjectvision
dc.subjectactions
dc.subjecturbanization
dc.subjectagricultural changes
dc.subjectcrop land patterns
dc.subjectenergy development
dc.subjectroads
dc.subjectpublic lands
dc.subjectprivate lands
dc.subjectdebate
dc.subjectownership patterns
dc.subjectscience plan
dc.subjectGreat Northern LCC
dc.subjectsingle species planning challenge
dc.subjectpractical perspective
dc.subjectfine filter
dc.subjectcoarse filter
dc.subjectecosystem perspective
dc.subjectgreater sage-grouse habitat
dc.subjectsage steppe habitat
dc.subjectsagebrush steppe habitat
dc.subjectconservation targets
dc.subjectintact landscapes
dc.subjectstressors
dc.subjectwatersheds
dc.subjectterrestrial systems
dc.subjectfreshwater systems
dc.subjectlitho-topographic template
dc.subjectreach scale
dc.subjectfactors
dc.subjectgeology
dc.subjectsoils
dc.subjectupstream
dc.subjectdownstream
dc.subjectlateral movement
dc.subjectwatershed scale
dc.subjecterosion
dc.subjectrunoff processes
dc.subjectchannel-floodplain interactions
dc.subjectchannel slope
dc.subjectvalley confinement
dc.subjecttectonics
dc.subjectspatial scale
dc.subjecttemporal scale
dc.subjectsediment supply
dc.subjectdischarge
dc.subjectroot reinforcement
dc.subjectwood supply
dc.subjectdifferent scientific disciplines
dc.subjectRocky Mountain National Park
dc.subjectMoraine Park
dc.subjecthydrogeomorphic classification
dc.subjecthierarchical order
dc.subjectbiotic
dc.subjectabiotic
dc.subjectunchanging
dc.subjectenduring features
dc.subjectlandscape facets
dc.subjecttrans-boundary connectivity
dc.subjectNorth American wilderness plan
dc.subjectUS-MX transboundary cover
dc.subjectUS-Mexico transboundary cover
dc.subjectUnited States-Mexico Transboundary Agreement
dc.subjecttransformative geospatial technology
dc.subjectEarth Engine workflow
dc.subjectGEE API “playground”
dc.subjectGoogle Earth Engine Application Programming Interface playground
dc.subjectlandforms
dc.subjectLand Cover Classification System
dc.subjectLCCS
dc.subjectMaps Engine
dc.subjectTIFF
dc.subjectfusion table
dc.subjectKML
dc.subjectinstructions
dc.subjectlocal computer
dc.subjectraster
dc.subjectvector
dc.subjectGoogle Earth
dc.subjectevaluation
dc.subjectinclusion of people
dc.subjectcitizen science
dc.subjectconstituents
dc.subjectGLUED
dc.subjectGlobal Land Use Emergent Database
dc.subjectcollaborative science platform
dc.subjectshared sample design
dc.subjectcollection efforts
dc.subjectco-location of data collection
dc.subjectco-location
dc.subjectopen source community platform
dc.subjectfederal datasets
dc.subjectstate-produced datasets
dc.subjectBush Administration
dc.subject162 land use plans
dc.subjectland-use plans
dc.subjectBLM Action Center
dc.subjectfounder
dc.subjectPam Eaton
dc.subjectplanning mania
dc.subjectlandscape level planning
dc.subjectlandscape-level planning
dc.subjectcollaboration
dc.subjectkey concepts
dc.subjectmodernizing concepts
dc.subjectgreater sage-grouse plans
dc.subject10 states
dc.subject67 million acres of habitat
dc.subject98 federal land use plans
dc.subjectland-use plans
dc.subject35 million acres
dc.subjectpriority habitat
dc.subjectstate agencies
dc.subjectlocal governments
dc.subjectconservationists
dc.subjectindustry
dc.subjectprivate landowners
dc.subjectnew provisions
dc.subjectFinal EIS
dc.subjectFinal Environmental Impact Statement
dc.subjectRecord of Decision
dc.subjectROD
dc.subjecthabitat classifications
dc.subjectsurface disturbance limitations
dc.subjectbuffers
dc.subjectenergy management
dc.subjectrecreation
dc.subjectmotorized use
dc.subjectstate variations
dc.subjectpermitted activities
dc.subjectstate differences
dc.subjecthabitat condition
dc.subjectpopulation numbers
dc.subjectsoft triggers
dc.subjectdialogue
dc.subjecthard triggers
dc.subjectimmediate action
dc.subjectright metrics
dc.subjectgreater sage-grouse implementation plans
dc.subjectformal guidance
dc.subjectSeptember 2016
dc.subjectoil and gas leasing
dc.subjecteffectiveness monitoring
dc.subjectdisturbance tracking
dc.subjecthabitat assessment
dc.subjectgrazing permit review
dc.subjectthresholds
dc.subjectsignificant threats
dc.subjectfull review
dc.subjectNEPA document
dc.subjectNational Environmental Policy Act
dc.subjectstakeholder meetings
dc.subjectinput
dc.subjectstate discussions
dc.subjectapproved projects
dc.subjectWyoming examples
dc.subjectJonah Infill Drilling Project
dc.subjectContinental Divide-Creston Natural Gas Development Project
dc.subjectUSGS/CSU study
dc.subjectUnited States Geological Survey
dc.subjectColorado State University
dc.subjectWyoming plan
dc.subjectone surface disturbance per square mile
dc.subject22 million-acre planning area
dc.subject10 million BLM acres
dc.subjectDesert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan
dc.subjecttwo phases
dc.subjectPhase I
dc.subjectfederal
dc.subjectPhase II
dc.subjectstate
dc.subjectintegrated process
dc.subjectcounties
dc.subjectspecial status species
dc.subjectspecial-status species
dc.subjectdesert tortoise
dc.subjectlisted species
dc.subjectstate and federal laws
dc.subjectsolar
dc.subjectwind
dc.subjecttransmission
dc.subjectDevelopment Focus Areas
dc.subjectDFAs
dc.subjectincentives
dc.subjectvariance lands
dc.subjectecoregions
dc.subjectCalifornia Desert National Conservation lands
dc.subjectwilderness characteristics
dc.subjectAreas of Critical Environmental Concern
dc.subjectACECs
dc.subjectRecreation Management Areas
dc.subjectWestern Solar Plan
dc.subjectCoachella Valley
dc.subjectCalifornia
dc.subjectNational Petroleum Reserve-Alaska
dc.subjectRegional Mitigation Strategy
dc.subjectDraft 2016
dc.subject22-plus million-acre planning area
dc.subjectsubsistence
dc.subjectimpacts compensation
dc.subjectnortheastern area of Reserve
dc.subjectbroader context
dc.subjectaction-based compensatory mitigation
dc.subjectfee-based options
dc.subjectrestoration
dc.subjectnew tools
dc.subjectconservation easement
dc.subjectNational Conservation Lands
dc.subjectcollaborative management
dc.subjectnational 15-year strategy
dc.subjectresearch
dc.subjectinventory
dc.subjectnational science strategy
dc.subjectThe Wilderness Society
dc.subjectTWS
dc.subjectcommitments
dc.subjectnew activities
dc.subjectBLM’s conservation mission
dc.subjectlessons
dc.subjectnew policies
dc.subjectimplementation
dc.subjectDeputy Solicitor for Land Resources
dc.subjectmodern challenges
dc.subjectlong-term management
dc.subjectpublic lands
dc.subjectFLPMA
dc.subjectFederal Land Policy and Management Act
dc.subjectlegacy
dc.subjecthistory of land disposal
dc.subjectreservation
dc.subjectbroken up chunks of land
dc.subjectexistential challenge
dc.subjectSagebrush Rebellion
dc.subjectlatest iteration
dc.subjecttake back the land movement
dc.subjectstates
dc.subjectKen Ivory
dc.subjectUtah House of Representatives
dc.subjectfederal government
dc.subjectpermanent ownership and management
dc.subjectUtah Transfer of Public Lands Act
dc.subject2012
dc.subjectUtah state legislature
dc.subjectseries of laws
dc.subjectrobust assertion
dc.subjectstate authority
dc.subjecttransfer of certain lands
dc.subjectDecember 2014
dc.subjectstate resources
dc.subjectultimatum
dc.subjectstudy period
dc.subjectevaluation of legal arguments
dc.subjectlawsuit
dc.subjectconstitutional authority
dc.subjectEnclave Clause
dc.subjectterritorial sections
dc.subjectUnited States Constitution
dc.subjectArticle 4
dc.subjecthistory of meaning of disposal
dc.subjectexistential threat
dc.subjectproponents
dc.subjectfederal authority
dc.subjectlow risk
dc.subjectlegislative portion
dc.subjectmilitary installations
dc.subjectnational purposes
dc.subjectjurisdiction scheme
dc.subjecttreaties
dc.subjectacquisitions purchases
dc.subjectconstitutional arguments
dc.subjectlitigation
dc.subjectequal footing doctrine
dc.subjectequal political sovereignty
dc.subjectsubmerged lands
dc.subjectnavigable waters
dc.subjectEnglish Crown
dc.subject13 states
dc.subjectcolonies
dc.subjectuplands
dc.subjectNevada
dc.subjectdrylands
dc.subjectUtah state
dc.subjectEnabling Act
dc.subjectdisclaimer language
dc.subjecttitle
dc.subjectIndian tribes
dc.subjectunappropriated public lands
dc.subjectextinguished title
dc.subjectProperty Clause theories
dc.subjectstate disclaimer clauses
dc.subjectWestern Attorneys General report
dc.subjectstate enabling
dc.subjectlegislation arguments
dc.subjectconstitutional arguments
dc.subjectStegner Center
dc.subjectUniversity of Utah
dc.subjectpublic land management
dc.subjectfederal government
dc.subjectRepublican Party platform 2016
dc.subjectabsentee ownership
dc.subjectuniversal legislation
dc.subjecttransfer of lands
dc.subjectwilling states
dc.subjectpolitical argument
dc.subjectnon-existential threats
dc.subjectinstrumental purpose
dc.subjectRS 2477
dc.subjectRevised Statute 2477
dc.subject1866 enactment
dc.subjectmining law
dc.subjectright of way
dc.subjecthighway construction
dc.subjectpublic purposes
dc.subjectvalid existing rights
dc.subjectpublic land
dc.subjectdisposal laws
dc.subject12
dc.subject000 roads
dc.subject12
dc.subject000 claims
dc.subjectmassive piece of litigation
dc.subjectfactually-specific evidence
dc.subjectFederal District Court for Utah
dc.subjectUnited States District Court for the District of Utah
dc.subjectUtah Attorney General’s Office
dc.subjectSolicitor’s Office
dc.subjectroadless areas
dc.subjectlegal roads
dc.subjectwilderness areas
dc.subjectSection 202 of FLPMA
dc.subjectslow process
dc.subjectbellwether set of claims
dc.subjectwilderness designation eligibility
dc.subjectTenth Circuit
dc.subjectUnited States Supreme Court
dc.subjectresolution
dc.subjectnegotiation process
dc.subjectcounties
dc.subjecttransportation system
dc.subjectmechanisms
dc.subjectright-of-way provision
dc.subjectTitle V
dc.subjectproperty rights
dc.subjectthreshold issues
dc.subjectSagebrush Rebellion
dc.subjectdisobedience issue
dc.subjectpublic land users
dc.subjectcitizens
dc.subjectdisobedience measures
dc.subjectpublic land managers
dc.subjectBLM employees
dc.subjectfear of intimidation
dc.subjectpending criminal cases
dc.subjectDepartment of Justice
dc.subjectsignificant deterrence
dc.subjectcattle impoundment
dc.subjectcomplex operation
dc.subjectparticipation
dc.subjectpartnership
dc.subjectpolitical environment
dc.subjectcontention
dc.subjecttoolbox
dc.subjectincentive effect
dc.subjectoff the grid
dc.subjecteconomic benefit
dc.subjectfuture generations
dc.subjectcomplex landscape planning
dc.subjectPlanning 2.0 rules
dc.subjectForest Service cases
dc.subjectNorthwest Forest Plan
dc.subjectNWFP
dc.subjectprinciples
dc.subjectuncertainty
dc.subjectPreamble
dc.subjectflexibility
dc.subjectpublic meetings
dc.subjectdifferent decisions
dc.subjectdifferent scales
dc.subjectcounty level
dc.subjectconcerns
dc.subjectboundaries too small
dc.subjectmigrating mule deer
dc.subjectRock Springs
dc.subjectPinedale
dc.subjectWyoming
dc.subjectGarfield County
dc.subjectpublic lands folks
dc.subjecttypes of decisions
dc.subjectexplicit language
dc.subjectspecific species
dc.subjectmanagement questions
dc.subjectecological scale
dc.subjectmule deer migration scale
dc.subjectmatch scales
dc.subjectbroad landscape scales
dc.subjectcoarser level information
dc.subjectgeneral information
dc.subjectcertainty
dc.subjectadaptive management concept
dc.subjecttargeted way
dc.subjectlegal needs
dc.subjectscientific organization of information
dc.subjecttwo Records of Decision
dc.subjectlegal circumstances
dc.subjectperil to the species
dc.subjectwarranted listing
dc.subjectconversation mismatch
dc.subjectdegradation
dc.subjectlegal attacks
dc.subjectconcepts
dc.subjectpositive pieces
dc.subjectcreative agenda
dc.subjectconservation as use of public lands
dc.subjecttraditional industrial-type uses
dc.subjectmitigation notion
dc.subjectmosaic of lands
dc.subjectstate ownership
dc.subjectstate regulation
dc.subjectfederal regulation
dc.subjectbroader benefits
dc.subjectecological benefits
dc.subjectboundary lines
dc.subjectDRECP
dc.subjectDesert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan
dc.subjectmultiple use
dc.subjectsuite of uses
dc.subjectconservation commitments
dc.subjectconservation benefits
dc.subjectpublic lands detriments
dc.subjectpublic engagement
dc.subjectpublic comment
dc.subjectproposal design
dc.subjectbroader public
dc.subjectlaw change
dc.subjectvalidity
dc.subjectnondelegable function
dc.subjectresponsibility discharge
dc.subjectriders
dc.subjectlegislation
dc.subjectstatus of rider
dc.subjectone-situation rider
dc.subjectbroader scale
dc.subjectObama to Trump transition
dc.subjectDonald Trump
dc.subjectSecond Amendment
dc.subjecthunting
dc.subjectplatform
dc.subjectRepublic Party split
dc.subjectcore support
dc.subjectHillary Clinton transition
dc.subjectCongress
dc.subjectSenate
dc.subjectnomination process
dc.subjectpublic lands issues
dc.subjectnot a high priority
dc.subjecthigh priority issue
dc.subjectincoming administration
dc.subjectUtah case
dc.subjectsimple statute
dc.subjectprivate citizens
dc.subjectpolitical support
dc.subjectgrand bargain
dc.subjectfunding
dc.subjectopportunity
dc.subjectpotential bargain
dc.subjectrhetoric
dc.subjectfederal government reorganization issue
dc.subjectDepartment of Natural Resources
dc.subjectmerger of BLM and Forest Service
dc.subject1905 split
dc.subjectPublic Land Law Review Commission
dc.subjectcompetition
dc.subjectpublic sector
dc.subjectfour competing agencies
dc.subjectClinton Administration
dc.subjectplaybook
dc.subjectclimate change
dc.subjectInstruction Memorandum
dc.subjecthigh-profile issues
dc.subjectcampaign
dc.subjectelection
dc.subjectexecutive leadership meeting
dc.subjecttwo political appointees
dc.subjectBLM career people
dc.subjectleadership team
dc.subjectstate leaders
dc.subjectBud Cribley
dc.subjectAlaska
dc.subjectFLPMA potential
dc.subjectmicrocosm
dc.subjectAmerican values
dc.subjectshared ownership
dc.subjectpolitical leadership
dc.subjectstrength
dc.subjectbelief in values
dc.subjectgood listeners
dc.subjectpublic land management issues
dc.subjectskill set
dc.subjectmodel behaviors
dc.subjectProposed Rule
dc.subjectcollaborative behavior
dc.subjectcreative skills
dc.subjectMatthew Allen
dc.subjectBLM Communications Director
dc.subjectevolutionary not revolutionary
dc.subjectunderinvestment
dc.subjectyouth program
dc.subjectJunior Ranger program
dc.subjectOMB
dc.subjectOffice of Management and Budget
dc.subjectveterans
dc.subjectrobust programs
dc.subjectcommunications
dc.subjectmedia
dc.subjectrobust investment
dc.subjectBLM budget increase
dc.subjectabandoned mine lands
dc.subjectcreative packaging
dc.subject501(c)(3) foundations
dc.subjectNational Park Service centennial
dc.subjectcharitable funds
dc.subjectstatutory authority
dc.subjectBLM Foundation
dc.subjectprivate investment
dc.subjectwild horse and burro issue
dc.subjectexpenditures
dc.subjectbipartisan coalition
dc.subjecteye on the money
dc.subjectDepartment of the Interior agencies
dc.subjectcollaborative skills
dc.subjectland patterns
dc.subjectcreativity
dc.subjectpoorest land agency
dc.subjectGovernor of New Mexico
dc.subjectgive the land back
dc.subjectadvice for new administration
dc.subjectscheme
dc.subjectnational issues
dc.subjectpublic land management employees
dc.subjectnatural resources law
dc.subjecttalk to ourselves
dc.subjectlarger dialogue in country
dc.subjectgun control
dc.subjectNRA issues
dc.subjectterrorism
dc.subjectBruce Babbitt
dc.subjectvoting constituency
dc.subjectBLM in 13 western states
dc.subjectswing vote
dc.subjectEast
dc.subjectopponents
dc.subjectWest
dc.subjectrecommendations
dc.subjectyouth education
dc.subjectpublic awareness
dc.subjectreconnect kids to the outdoors and nature
dc.subjectnational parks
dc.subjectnational forests
dc.subjectBLM lands
dc.subjectReagan Administration
dc.subjectJob Corps
dc.subjectYACC
dc.subjectYoung Adult Conservation Corps
dc.subjectYCC
dc.subjectYouth Conservation Corps
dc.subjectYouth at Risk
dc.subjectresidential camps
dc.subjectinner city youth
dc.subjectpublic lands projects
dc.subjectpersonal connection to the land
dc.subjectdegrees in sciences
dc.subjectnatural resources management
dc.subjectCCC
dc.subjectCivilian Conservation Corps
dc.subject1933 to 1942
dc.subjectDepression
dc.subjectDust Bowl era
dc.subjectreforestation
dc.subjectRichard Louv’s book
dc.subjectThe Last Child in the Woods
dc.subjecturbanization
dc.subjectAmerica
dc.subjectAmmon Bundy
dc.subjectMalheur National Wildlife Refuge
dc.subjectreinventing government
dc.subjectcustomer service
dc.subjectAl Gore
dc.subjectAT&T vice-president
dc.subjecttaxpayers’ point of view
dc.subjectcombinations of offices
dc.subjectcustomer point of view
dc.subjectBrett Dickson
dc.subjectDave Theobald
dc.subjectbetter service delivery
dc.subjectscience delivery
dc.subjectfederal agency research programs
dc.subjectUSGS
dc.subjectnational monuments
dc.subjectnimbleness
dc.subjectsupport of Pew
dc.subjectinformation gathering
dc.subjectbiological and physical sciences
dc.subjectsocial sciences
dc.subjectpublic land management conservation sciences arena
dc.subjectcounterparts
dc.subjectaquifer recharge
dc.subjectcentral reorganization
dc.subjectbiggest bang for the buck
dc.subjectfield offices mergers
dc.subjectBLM history
dc.subjectstate director
dc.subjectregions
dc.subjectexpensive impacts
dc.subjectnatural hazards
dc.subjecttree mortality
dc.subjectprecipitation increase
dc.subjectfloods
dc.subjectwarming
dc.subjectrunoff
dc.subjectinfrastructure capacity
dc.subjectbig hook
dc.subjectresponse challenge
dc.subjectpolicy challenge
dc.subjectcommunications challenge
dc.subjectwildfire
dc.subjectDale Bosworth
dc.subjectForest Service employee
dc.subjectBruce Babbitt
dc.subjectArizona Governor
dc.subjectfire experts
dc.subjectfire suppression
dc.subjectwasted money
dc.subjectanti-deficiency
dc.subjectantideficiency
dc.subjectOregon
dc.subjectKalmiopsis Wilderness
dc.subjectfuel
dc.subjectmoisture levels
dc.subjectmoney pressure
dc.subjectwildfire bill
dc.subjectfiscal standpoint
dc.subjectfunding standpoint
dc.subjectcommunications optics issue
dc.subjecttechnical fire science conservation issue
dc.subjectclimate change funding industry
dc.subjectbig disasters
dc.subjectpolitics
dc.subjectsolutions
dc.subjectopportunities
dc.subjectpositive terms
dc.subjectsoil erosion
dc.subjectclean water
dc.subjectclear language
dc.subjectplay outdoors
dc.subjectfishing
dc.subjecthiking
dc.subjectbiking
dc.subjectwood
dc.subjectminerals
dc.subjectunifying theme
dc.subjectriparian areas
dc.subjectdetails
dc.subjectbait
dc.subjectbites that deliver
dc.subjecton the ground
dc.subjectoptimistic view
dc.subjectsustainability agenda
dc.subjectmajor initiative
dc.subjectyouth programs
dc.subjectBears Ears Monument
dc.subjectunites rather than divides
dc.subjectbig ticket items
dc.subjecttiming
dc.subjectright size
dc.subjectpolitical rhetoric
dc.subjectWashington political culture
dc.subjectnegative impact
dc.subjectCalifornia
dc.subjectfunctioning government
dc.subjectdeals
dc.subjectpeople talk to each other
dc.subjectlabor unions
dc.subjectenvironmental groups
dc.subjectDemocratic Party funders
dc.subjectmoney distribution
dc.subjectmother’s milk of politics
dc.subjectpayments
dc.subjectlower taxes
dc.subjectdeep recession
dc.subjectTrump phenomenon
dc.subjectanger
dc.subjecthate
dc.subjectbrighter future
dc.subjectuncertain rocky times
dc.subjectAdministrative Law
dc.subjectBiodiversity
dc.subjectEnergy Policy
dc.subjectEnvironmental Law
dc.subjectEnvironmental Policy
dc.subjectForest Management
dc.subjectLand Use Law
dc.subjectNatural Resource Economics
dc.subjectNatural Resources and Conservation
dc.subjectNatural Resources Law
dc.subjectNatural Resources Management and Policy
dc.subjectOil, Gas, and Energy
dc.subjectOil, Gas, and Mineral Law
dc.subjectRecreation, Parks and Tourism Administration
dc.subjectState and Local Government Law
dc.titleVIDEO: Session 4: Modern Challenges and Modern Solutions, and Session 5: The Future of our Public Lands
dc.typetext
ge.collectioncodeBA
ge.collectioncodeEC
ge.collectioncodeEF
ge.collectioncodeFF
ge.dataimportlabelOAI metadata object
ge.identifier.legacyglobethics:11143342
ge.identifier.permalinkhttps://www.globethics.net/gel/11143342
ge.lastmodificationdate2017-08-19 00:49
ge.lastmodificationuseradmin@pointsoftware.ch (import)
ge.submissions0
ge.oai.exportid53
ge.oai.repositoryid552
ge.oai.streamid1
ge.setnameGlobeEthicsLib
ge.setspecglobeethicslib
ge.linkhttp://scholar.law.colorado.edu/flpma-turns-40/6
ge.linkhttps://youtu.be/I_lvtBSF9FE


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record