Substitution and Technological Change under Carbon Cap and Trade : 
 Lessons from Europe
Keywords
FUEL SWITCHINGELECTRICITY PRODUCTION
CARBON
INPUT PRICES
CLIMATE CHANGE POLICIES
POTENTIAL DEMAND
INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY
ALLOCATION OF PERMITS
EMISSION TRADING
THERMAL EFFICIENCY
ENERGY PRODUCTION
IRREVERSIBLE INVESTMENTS
HEAT RATE
ELECTRICITY PRODUCERS
FUEL PRICES
PRICING MODEL
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
ATMOSPHERE
HEAT
CERTIFIED EMISSION REDUCTIONS
FUEL SUBSTITUTION
PRICE ELASTICITY
SURPLUS
EMISSION CONTROLS
EMISSIONS INCREASES
GREENHOUSE GAS
COMBUSTION
CARBON ABATEMENT
RENEWABLE ENERGY GENERATION
FUELS
COAL
CARBON EMISSION FACTOR
RENEWABLE SOURCES
RENEWABLE ENERGY
CARBON CAPTURE
REDUCTION IN CARBON
FREE ENERGY
GEOTHERMAL CAPACITY
CYCLE GAS
CARBON FUELS
CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSIONS
OIL PRICES
CARBON OFFSETS
SPOT PRICES
OIL REFINERIES
CARBON PRICING
EMISSION REDUCTIONS
CARBON EMISSION
HYDROELECTRIC ENERGY
EMISSION PERMITS
PRODUCTION OF ELECTRICITY
CARBON OFFSET
POWER GRID
BIOMASS
RENEWABLE RESOURCES
NUCLEAR FUEL
MEMBER STATES
RENEWABLE GENERATION
FUEL USE
FOSSIL
ENERGY PRICES
PETROLEUM
EMPLOYMENT
NATURAL GAS OUTPUT
DEMAND ELASTICITY
OIL
PRIMARY ENERGY
CARBON EMISSION REDUCTIONS
CONSUMPTION OF PETROLEUM
EMISSION
FACTOR PRICES
SULFUR
ELECTRICITY
FOSSIL FUELS
ENERGY MARKETS
FUEL PRICE
ELECTRICITY GENERATION
NUCLEAR POWER
GENERATING CAPACITY
CARBON INTENSITY
FUEL OIL
CARBON DIOXIDE
NATURAL GAS PRICES
CARBON PRICES
SULFUR DIOXIDE
NUCLEAR ELECTRICITY
GAS TURBINE
CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSION
ELECTRIC POWER SECTOR
ELECTRIC POWER PRODUCTION
NATURAL RESOURCES
CARBON PATH
CARBON ENERGY
HYDROELECTRIC POWER
MONOPOLY
SUBSTITUTES
OIL PRICE
EMISSION ABATEMENT
CARBON MARKETS
MARGINAL GENERATION
ENERGY MARKET
RENEWABLE ENERGY CAPACITY
NATURAL GAS
RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES
WHOLESALE PRICES
AVAILABILITY
PRICES OF FUELS
CARBON PRICE
PRIMARY FUEL
NUCLEAR GENERATION
MARKET PRICES
AVERAGE PRICES
FOSSIL ENERGY
POWER PRODUCERS
MARGINAL GENERATION COST
CLIMATE CHANGE
FERROUS METALS
ENERGY SERVICE
GREENHOUSE
DEMAND FUNCTIONS
FUEL
POWER
FOSSIL FUEL
ELECTRICITY PRICES
FOSSIL FUEL CONSUMPTION
ELECTRIC UTILITIES
EMISSION FACTOR
NUCLEAR PLANTS
POLLUTION
ELECTRIC POWER GENERATION
CARBON EMISSIONS
GAS TURBINE TECHNOLOGY
MARGINAL COST OF ELECTRICITY
CLIMATE POLICY
PURCHASING
POWER SECTOR
GENERATION CAPACITY
CEMENT
ELASTICITY OF SUBSTITUTION
ELECTRIC POWER
ENERGY RESOURCES
DEMAND FOR ELECTRICITY
RENEWABLE ELECTRICITY
FOSSIL FUEL USE
PRICE CHANGES
NATURAL GAS CONSUMPTION
SALES
APPROACH
CARBON CONTENT
EMISSION LIMITS
GEOTHERMAL ENERGY
ENERGY SOURCES
NUCLEAR ENERGY
WIND
STOCKS
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/4150Abstract
The use of carbon-intense fuels by the
 power sector contributes significantly to the greenhouse gas
 emissions of most countries. For this reason, the sector is
 often key to initial efforts to regulate emissions. But how
 long does it take before new regulatory incentives result in
 a switch to less carbon intense fuels? This study examines
 fuel switching in electricity production following the
 introduction of the European Union s Emissions Trading
 System, a cap-and-trade regulatory framework for greenhouse
 gas emissions. The empirical analysis examines the demand
 for carbon permits, carbon based fuels, and carbon-free
 energy for 12 European countries using monthly data on fuel
 use, prices, and electricity generation. A short-run
 restricted cost function is estimated in which carbon
 permits, high-carbon fuels, and low-carbon fuels are
 variable inputs, conditional on quasi-fixed carbon-free
 energy production from nuclear, hydro, and renewable energy
 capacity. The results indicate that prices for permits and
 fuels affect the composition of inputs in a statistically
 significant way. Even so, the analysis suggests that the
 industry s fuel-switching capabilities are limited in the
 short run as is the scope for introducing new technologies.
 This is because of the dominant role that past irreversible
 investments play in determining power-generating capacity.
 Moreover, the results suggest that, because the capacity for
 fuel substitution is limited, the impact of carbon emission
 limits on electricity prices can be significant if fuel
 prices increase together with carbon permit prices. The
 estimates suggest that for every 10 percent rise in carbon
 and fuel prices, the marginal cost of electric power
 generation increases by 8 percent in the short run. The
 European experience points to the importance of starting
 early down a low-carbon path and of policies that introduce
 flexibility in how emission reductions are achieved.Date
2012-03-19Type
Publications & Research :: Policy Research Working PaperIdentifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/4150http://hdl.handle.net/10986/4150
Copyright/License
CC BY 3.0 IGOCollections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Substitution and Technological Change under Carbon Cap and Trade : Lessons from EuropeLarson, Donald F.; Considine, Timothy J. (2012-03-19)The use of carbon-intense fuels by the power sector contributes significantly to the greenhouse gas emissions of most countries. For this reason, the sector is often key to initial efforts to regulate emissions. But how long does it take before new regulatory incentives result in a switch to less carbon intense fuels? This study examines fuel switching in electricity production following the introduction of the European Union s Emissions Trading System, a cap-and-trade regulatory framework for greenhouse gas emissions. The empirical analysis examines the demand for carbon permits, carbon based fuels, and carbon-free energy for 12 European countries using monthly data on fuel use, prices, and electricity generation. A short-run restricted cost function is estimated in which carbon permits, high-carbon fuels, and low-carbon fuels are variable inputs, conditional on quasi-fixed carbon-free energy production from nuclear, hydro, and renewable energy capacity. The results indicate that prices for permits and fuels affect the composition of inputs in a statistically significant way. Even so, the analysis suggests that the industry s fuel-switching capabilities are limited in the short run as is the scope for introducing new technologies. This is because of the dominant role that past irreversible investments play in determining power-generating capacity. Moreover, the results suggest that, because the capacity for fuel substitution is limited, the impact of carbon emission limits on electricity prices can be significant if fuel prices increase together with carbon permit prices. The estimates suggest that for every 10 percent rise in carbon and fuel prices, the marginal cost of electric power generation increases by 8 percent in the short run. The European experience points to the importance of starting early down a low-carbon path and of policies that introduce flexibility in how emission reductions are achieved.
-
Ukraine : Investment Plan for the Clean Technology FundWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2010-01)This report describes the Ukraine Investment Plan for the Clean Technology Fund. Ukraine is a lower middle income country, with GDP per capita of US$1,940 in 2006. After a decade of steep economic decline, economic growth rebounded in 2000 and GDP grew by about 7.5 percent per year on average until 2007. To recover its economic growth and improve competitiveness, Ukraine will need to address a combination of challenges. Improving the energy efficiency of the economy and thereby reducing its vulnerability to further import price shocks, as well as modernizing the energy sector to make it more efficient, are among those challenges. The Energy Strategy of Ukraine for the Period until 2030, adopted in 2006, provides a platform for addressing these issues over the three distinct phases of development envisaged for the country. Energy and industry are the priority sectors for intervention as they account for 69 percent and 22 percent of country s GHG emissions, respectively The interventions with the highest potential for reducing GHG emissions in Ukraine are: (1) energy efficiency; (2) increased use of nuclear power; (3) implementation of high efficiency combustion technologies and carbon capture and storage (CCS) for new coal-fired plants; and (4) renewable energy.
-
Meeting the Balance of Electricity Supply and Demand in Latin America and the CaribbeanJohnson, Todd M.; Yepez-Garcia, Rigoberto Ariel; Andres, Luis Alberto (World Bank, 2012-03-19)Economic growth in the Latin America and the Caribbean region has picked up considerably during the past decade or so. This growth has been aided by widespread (earlier and more recent) investments in power generation, transmission, and distribution that increased the provision of electricity services to households, commerce, and industry. This report evaluates a number of critical issues for the power sector in the region in the coming two decades. These include the expected rates of increase in the demand for electricity, the required supply of new generating capacity, the technology and fuel mix of that generating capacity, and the carbon dioxide emissions of the sector. One of the key contributions of this study is the aggregation of individual country plans to the regional and sub regional levels, using a consistent set of data and a common methodology. The report also assesses the important roles of hydropower and natural gas, the way other clean and low-carbon resources can be expanded, the potential and benefits of greater electricity trade, and the role of energy efficiency. By considering the region as a whole, the report highlights the role that individual countries will play in shaping the region's aggregate power sector.