Mexico - Agriculture and Rural Development Public Expenditure Review
Author(s)
World BankKeywords
REDISTRIBUTIVE IMPACTDEREGULATION
FODDER
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE
EXPENDITURE POLICIES
ENTITLEMENTS
AGRICULTURAL WAGE
CONDITIONALITY
AGRICULTURAL LAND
GOVERNMENT FUNDING
ACCOUNTABILITY
MATCHING GRANTS
FISCAL COSTS
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
DROUGHT
LAND TENURE
ANNUAL CYCLE
AGRICULTURAL WAGE LABOR
EXPENDITURE PROGRAMS
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE REVIEW
GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
ANNUAL EXPENDITURE CEILINGS
SOCIAL PROTECTION
SUBNATIONAL
RURAL SECTORS
EQUITY ISSUES
AGRICULTURAL GROWTH
HEALTH SERVICES
ALLOCATION
PROGRAM EXPENDITURE
REDUCING EMISSIONS
RANGELANDS
BUDGETARY RESOURCES
FEDERAL ENTITIES
AGRICULTURAL SUBSIDIES
ANTI-POVERTY
RESOURCE CONSERVATION
SECTORAL MINISTRIES
CAPITAL INVESTMENT
DOMESTIC PRICES
SOCIAL WELFARE
PROGRAMS
POLICY ENVIRONMENT
PUBLIC BUDGET
SUSTAINABLE USE
ALLOCATION OF FUNDS
WATER SCARCE REGIONS
POLICY REFORMS
SECTOR PROGRAMS
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE PROGRAM
VULNERABLE GROUPS
ANNUAL BUDGET
HOUSING
BUDGETARY CLASSIFICATION
ENVIRONMENTAL COSTS
POVERTY POLICIES
DECISION-MAKING
NATURAL RESOURCES
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
POVERTY REDUCTION
RURAL PUBLIC
COMMODITY PRICES
POVERTY REDUCTION PROGRAMS
FISCAL COST
TAX EXEMPTIONS
PRIVATE SECTOR
RURAL DEVELOPMENT
AGRICULTURAL ACTIVITIES
AGRICULTURAL PRODUCT
FARMS
TRANSPARENCY
FARM INCOME
SUB-NATIONAL AUTHORITIES
REFORM EFFORTS
CENTRAL AUTHORITIES
RURAL POVERTY RATE
PUBLIC GOODS
CLIMATE CHANGE
TRADEOFFS
TRADE LIBERALIZATION
AGRICULTURAL POLICY
ACCOUNTING
FINANCIAL CRISIS
PROGRAM EVALUATIONS
FOOD PRICES
HUMAN CAPITAL
AGRICULTURAL INSURANCE
BUDGETARY ANALYSIS
BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS
RURAL POVERTY RATES
SMALL FARMERS
MUNICIPALITIES
PRIVATE PROVIDERS
AGRICULTURAL WORKERS
SUB-NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS
PUBLIC SECTOR
BUDGETARY DECISION
CARBON
FEDERAL BUDGET
CONCENTRATION COEFFICIENT
RURAL INFRASTRUCTURE
PUBLIC ACCOUNTS
RURAL HOUSEHOLDS
PROGRAM OBJECTIVES
RURAL PRODUCERS
SAVINGS
FOOD PRICE
EXPENDITURES
AQUIFERS
TARGETING
MARKET ECONOMIES
MERIT GOODS
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION
POSITIVE EXTERNALITIES
EFFICIENT ALLOCATION
BENEFICIARIES
PUBLIC GOOD
WELFARE PROGRAMS
NON FARM INCOME
RURAL SECTOR
CARIBBEAN REGION
POOR
TOTAL PUBLIC SPENDING
RURAL POVERTY
EXPENDITURE PER CAPITA
POLICY INSTRUMENTS
COMMERCIAL FARMERS
LEVEL OF PUBLIC SPENDING
BUDGETARY EXPENDITURES
REGULATORY AUTHORITY
EFFICIENCY GAINS
BLOCK GRANTS
RURAL
AVERAGE PUBLIC EXPENDITURE
RURAL HOUSEHOLD INCOME
AGRARIAN REFORM
NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT
SUSTAINABLE RURAL DEVELOPMENT
SUBSISTENCE
PRIVATE GOODS
AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS
RURAL FINANCE
EXCHANGE RATE
EXPENDITURE ALLOCATIONS
BUDGETARY ALLOCATIONS
INEQUALITY
SOCIAL PROGRAMS
POLICY ANALYSTS
EMISSIONS
RISK MANAGEMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL
IRRIGATION
LAND REFORM
STRATEGIC PLANS
EQUITY ASPECTS
PRODUCTIVE RESOURCES
POOR RURAL HOUSEHOLDS
FORESTRY
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE PROGRAMS
PUBLIC INVESTMENT
RURAL HOUSEHOLD
BUDGETARY SYSTEM
INCOME SUPPORT
HUMAN CAPITAL INVESTMENT
MAYOR
RURAL POPULATION
FARM INCOMES
GROWTH RATE
INCOME
POLICY REFORM
RURAL POOR
EXTREME POVERTY
EXPENDITURE DATA
FARMERS
NEGATIVE EXTERNALITIES
RURAL CREDIT
TOTAL POVERTY
PUBLIC EXPENDITURES
CASH TRANSFERS
AGRICULTURAL SECTORS
MUNICIPAL LEVEL
STATE GOVERNMENTS
AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION
PUBLIC RESOURCES
AGRICULTURAL SECTOR
INPUT USE
SOCIAL SERVICES
LIVING CONDITIONS
CASH TRANSFER PROGRAMS
FARMER
RURAL AREAS
BUDGETARY DECISIONS
POLICY ACTIONS
AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH
ANTI-POVERTY PROGRAM
RURAL COMMUNITIES
BUDGET TRANSFERS
FARM SECTOR
COUNTERPART FUNDING
SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE
FEDERAL MINISTRIES
RURAL POVERTY REDUCTION
NATIONAL POLICIES
EXPENDITURE ALLOCATION
STATE GOVERNMENT
RESOURCE ALLOCATIONS
ECONOMIC INCENTIVES
DECENTRALIZATION
AGRICULTURAL SUPPORT
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/3153Abstract
This study examines agricultural and
 rural development (ARD) public expenditures in Mexico. The
 study is based on federal public expenditures. The study is
 structured in six parts as follows: the first part presents
 the Mexican ARD context in terms of policy and performance.
 The second part dissects the ARD public budget, classifying
 expenditure programs in various ways so as to provide an
 overview of the scope and composition of ARD spending. The
 third part analyses efficiency issues by means of
 international and state-level comparisons of agriculture
 public expenditures (APE) and agriculture performance
 indicators. The main focus of the assessment is on APE, but
 these are evaluated within the broader context of rural
 development policies, considering the degree of consistency
 and complementarily between the two sets of policies. The
 fourth part investigates equity issues emerging from ARD
 expenditures. Equity is evaluated at the level of geographic
 units (states and municipalities) and of individuals and
 households. In addition to assessing the equity impacts of
 the main rural programs, an effort is made to evaluate the
 overall equity implications of the entire APE and of rural
 development expenditure (RDE). The fifth part contains a
 brief analysis of the Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E)
 system of ARD programs and of selected institutional
 aspects, and highlights some issues. Finally, the sixth part
 offers reflections on possible directions for moving
 forwards both for the overall evolution of ARD expenditures
 and for some of the main programs.Date
2012-03-19Type
Economic & Sector Work :: Public Expenditure ReviewIdentifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/3153http://hdl.handle.net/10986/3153
Copyright/License
CC BY 3.0 IGORelated items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Mexico - Analisis del gasto publico en el desarrollo agricola y ruralWorld Bank (World Bank, 2012-03-19)This study examines agricultural and rural development (ARD) public expenditures in Mexico. The study is based on federal public expenditures. The study is structured in six parts as follows: the first part presents the Mexican ARD context in terms of policy and performance. The second part dissects the ARD public budget, classifying expenditure programs in various ways so as to provide an overview of the scope and composition of ARD spending. The third part analyses efficiency issues by means of international and state-level comparisons of agriculture public expenditures (APE) and agriculture performance indicators. The main focus of the assessment is on APE, but these are evaluated within the broader context of rural development policies, considering the degree of consistency and complementarily between the two sets of policies. The fourth part investigates equity issues emerging from ARD expenditures. Equity is evaluated at the level of geographic units (states and municipalities) and of individuals and households. In addition to assessing the equity impacts of the main rural programs, an effort is made to evaluate the overall equity implications of the entire APE and of rural development expenditure (RDE). The fifth part contains a brief analysis of the Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) system of ARD programs and of selected institutional aspects, and highlights some issues. Finally, the sixth part offers reflections on possible directions for moving forwards both for the overall evolution of ARD expenditures and for some of the main programs.
-
The United Republic of Tanzania : Evaluation of the Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper Process and Arrangements under the Poverty Reduction and Growth FacilityIMF Independent Evaluation Office; Operations Evaluation Department (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2014-09-17)This evaluation of the Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (PRSP) and Poverty Reduction Growth Facility (PRGF) processes in Tanzania was jointly undertaken by the Operations Evaluation Department (OED) of the World Bank and the Independent Evaluation Office (IEO) of the IMF. The goal of the evaluation, as emphasized in the joint terms of reference, is to inform the policies and internal processes of the World Bank and the IMF, but not to evaluate the performance of the government. The report is laid out as follows: section two provides a background to the poverty situation in Tanzania as well as the economic and political context. The section also looks at the national strategies and processes for policy formulation that preceded the introduction of the PRSP and the PRGF. Section three discusses the Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper process in Tanzania, starting with a look at the relevance of the process to the key development challenges facing the country and then turns to the issue of how the underlying principles of the PRSP have been applied. It concludes with an analysis of the preliminary results.
-
Republic of Mozambique : Evaluation of the Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper Process and Arrangements Under the Poverty Reduction and Growth FacilityInternational Monetary Fund; World Bank (Washington, DC, 2004-07-06)The International Monetary Fund (IMF)
 and the World Bank introduced the Poverty Reduction Strategy
 Paper (PRSP) process in 1999 to strengthen the poverty
 alleviation focus of their assistance to low-income
 countries. At the IMF, the introduction of the PRSP was
 accompanied by the transformation of the Enhanced Structural
 Adjustment Facility (ESAF), the concessional lending window,
 into the Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility (PRGF), with
 a view to giving a more central role to poverty reduction
 and pro-poor growth considerations in the design of
 IMF-supported programs in low-income countries. The rest of
 the report is organized as follows. Part two provides
 background information on poverty incidence in Mozambique,
 as well as on political and economic developments since the
 early 1990s. The relevance of the PRSP approach to
 Mozambique s situation, application of the underlying
 principles, and preliminary evidence on results, are
 examined in part three. The effectiveness of IMF assistance,
 including alignment of the PRGF and technical assistance to
 PRSP objectives is assessed in part four. Part five
 considers the effectiveness of World Bank support, also
 including alignment of that support to the objectives of the
 PRSP approach. Part six reviews IMF-World Bank collaboration
 in relation to the PRSP process, and part seven presents the
 main conclusions and lessons.